# Asthma remission and its predictors in severe asthma: real-world study from the Korean severe asthma registry

## TL;DR

This study examines asthma remission in Korean patients with severe asthma, identifying factors that predict remission in a real-world setting.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world data on asthma remission in an Asian population, identifying clinical predictors for remission in severe asthma.

## Key findings

- At 12 months, 5.9% achieved complete clinical remission, while 18.3% achieved clinical remission.
- Higher baseline ACT scores predicted remission, while OCS use and chronic cough were negatively associated.
- Remission groups had better lung function and fewer exacerbations compared to non-remission groups.

## Abstract

Remission has emerged as a therapeutic goal in asthma, but most studies in severe asthma have focused on biologic-treated patients in controlled settings. Real-world data from Asian populations are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the achievement and predictors of asthma remission in Korean patients with severe asthma using a nationwide prospective cohort.

We analyzed 405 patients with severe asthma from the Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR) who completed 12-month follow-up. Remission was classified at 12 and 24 months as complete clinical remission (CCR; ACT ≥ 20, no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroid [OCS] use, and FEV₁ ≥80% or improvement ≥ 100 mL), clinical remission (CR; first three criteria), partial remission (PR; ≥1 criterion), and no remission (NR; none). Ordinal logistic regression identified baseline predictors of higher remission.

At 12 months, CCR, CR, PR, and NR were achieved in 5.9%, 18.3%, 67.9%, and 7.9% of participants. Among those with 24-month follow-up (n = 139), remission status was largely stable. Higher baseline ACT score (OR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.12–1.27) predicted remission, while maintenance OCS use (OR: 0.11, 95% CI 0.05–0.25) and chronic cough (OR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.89) were negatively associated. Remission groups had better baseline lung function, fewer exacerbations, and low WBC counts. Baseline biologic use was more common in CCR, CR groups, whereas NR patients more frequently received methylxanthines, macrolides, and OCS.

Clinical predictors, including asthma control, OCS use, and chronic cough may help guide remission-focused strategies in the treatment of severe asthma.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-025-03451-y.