The genome sequence of the Southern Grizzled Skipper, Pyrgus malvoides (Elwes & Edwards, 1897) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae)
Yannick Chittaro, Kay Lucek, Charlotte J. Wright, Joana I. Meier, Mark L. Blaxter, Luana Bataglia, Taslima Sheikh, Matthew Merkin, Olli-Pekka Smolander
TL;DR
This paper provides the genome sequence of the Southern Grizzled Skipper butterfly, including two haplotypes and a mitochondrial genome.
Contribution
The study presents a high-quality genome assembly for Pyrgus malvoides, including haplotype-specific scaffolding and a mitochondrial genome.
Findings
The genome assembly includes two haplotypes totaling 746.71 and 747.11 megabases.
Haplotype 1 is scaffolded into 31 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the Z sex chromosome.
The mitochondrial genome is assembled with a length of 15.41 kilobases.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from a male specimen of Pyrgus malvoides (Southern Grizzled Skipper; Arthropoda; Insecta; Lepidoptera; Hesperiidae). The assembly contains two haplotypes with total lengths of 746.71 megabases and 747.11 megabases. Most of haplotype 1 (99.8%) is scaffolded into 31 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the Z sex chromosome. Haplotype 2 was assembled to scaffold level. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled, with a length of 15.41 kilobases.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6| Platform | PacBio HiFi | Hi-C |
|---|---|---|
|
| ilPyrMalo1 | ilPyrMalo1 |
|
| SAN28000130 | SAN28000130 |
|
| SAMEA115110012 | SAMEA115110012 |
|
| SAMEA115110049 | SAMEA115110050 |
|
| thorax | head |
|
| Revio | Illumina NovaSeq X |
|
| ERR13660018 | ERR13654255 |
|
| 3.68 million | 711.95 million |
|
| 38.68 Gb | 107.50 Gb |
|
| ilPyrMalo1.hap1.1 | ilPyrMalo1.hap2.1 |
|
| GCA_964264845.1 | GCA_964264935.1 |
|
| chromosome | scaffold |
|
| 746.71 | 747.11 |
|
| 31 | N/A |
|
| 204 | 185 |
|
| 9.82 Mb | 7.94 Mb |
|
| 82 | 57 |
|
| 27.17 Mb | 26.88 Mb |
|
| 33.5 | N/A |
|
| Z | N/A |
|
| Mitochondrial genome: 15.41 kb | N/A |
| INSDC accession | Molecule | Length (Mb) | GC% | Assigned Merian elements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33.50 | 36.50 | M14;M2 | |
| 2 | 30.94 | 36.50 | M1 | |
| 3 | 30.77 | 36.50 | M7 | |
| 4 | 30.73 | 36.50 | M17;M20 | |
| 5 | 30.11 | 36.50 | M8 | |
| 6 | 30.09 | 36.50 | M9 | |
| 7 | 29.73 | 36.50 | M12 | |
| 8 | 29.16 | 36.50 | M5 | |
| 9 | 28.95 | 36.50 | M3 | |
| 10 | 27.90 | 36.50 | M18 | |
| 11 | 27.59 | 36.50 | M16 | |
| 12 | 27.17 | 36.50 | M6 | |
| 13 | 25.89 | 37 | M22 | |
| 14 | 25.83 | 37 | M4 | |
| 15 | 25.51 | 36.50 | M21 | |
| 16 | 25.44 | 37 | M11 | |
| 17 | 25.36 | 37 | M15 | |
| 18 | 25.20 | 37.50 | M23 | |
| 19 | 24.07 | 37 | M10 | |
| 20 | 23.26 | 37 | M13 | |
| 21 | 21.99 | 38.50 | M19 | |
| 22 | 20.25 | 37.50 | M14 | |
| 23 | 18.05 | 37.50 | M26 | |
| 24 | 17.49 | 37.50 | M24 | |
| 25 | 16.08 | 37.50 | M28 | |
| 26 | 14.37 | 37.50 | M27 | |
| 27 | 12.93 | 40.50 | M30 | |
| 28 | 11.80 | 38.50 | M31 | |
| 29 | 11.15 | 38 | M25 | |
| 30 | 10.62 | 38 | M29 | |
| Z | 33.30 | 36.50 | MZ |
| Measure | Value | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| EBP summary (haplotype 1) | 6.7.Q67 | 6.C.Q40 |
| Contig N50 length | 9.82 Mb | ≥ 1 Mb |
| Scaffold N50 length | 27.17 Mb | = chromosome N50 |
| Consensus quality (QV) | Haplotype 1: 67.7; haplotype 2: 66.8; combined: 67.2 | ≥ 40 |
|
| Haplotype 1: 71.37%; Haplotype 2: 71.43%; combined: 99.52% | ≥ 95% |
| BUSCO | C:98.6%[S:98.2%‚D:0.4%]‚ F:0.2%‚M:1.2%‚n:5 286 | S > 90%; D < 5% |
| Percentage of assembly assigned to chromosomes | 99.80%% | ≥ 90% |
- —Swiss National Science Foundation
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy · Genetic diversity and population structure
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Opisthokonta; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Amphiesmenoptera; Lepidoptera; Glossata; Neolepidoptera; Heteroneura; Ditrysia; Obtectomera; Hesperioidea; Hesperiidae; Pyrginae; Pyrgus; Pyrgus malvoides (Elwes & Edwards, 1897) (NCBI:txid1107715)
Background
The Southern Grizzled Skipper Pyrgus malvoides is widespread in south-western Europe. It colonises the Iberian Peninsula, the southern half of France and Switzerland, Liechtenstein, western Austria, the extreme south of Germany, Italy (including Sicily), western Slovenia and north-western Croatia (Istria) ( Aistleitner, 1996; De Jong, 1972; Fuchs & Wolf, 2006; Guillaumin, 1971; Huemer & Tarmann, 1993; Koren et al., 2013; LSPN, 1999).
In the north and east, P. malvoides is replaced by its sister species Pyrgus malvae. In addition, Pyrgus melotis is found in Turkey and the Middle East ( De Jong, 1987). In the past, these three taxa were sometimes considered to be a ‘semi-species’, belonging to the ‘superspecies’ Pyrgus malvae ( De Jong, 1972). Other authors have considered the taxon malvoides to be a subspecies of Pyrgus malvae ( Higgins, 1975; Tshikolovets, 2011). These two taxa have a parapatric distribution and are known to hybridise regularly in the contact zone ( Aistleitner, 1996; Guillaumin, 1962; Guillaumin, 1971; Higgins, 1975). However, this contact zone remains narrow ( Guillaumin, 1971) and constant, and since there are marked differences on male and female genitalia ( De Jong, 1972), the two taxa are now generally treated as distinct species in recent references ( Wiemers et al., 2018).
Compared to other Pyrgus species occurring in the range of P. malvoides, this species is easily recognised by its small size and the well-defined white spots on the upper side of the hindwings. In addition, the underside of the hindwings has distinct bright veins, and the bright spots are generally very small.
The female lays her eggs individually, usually on the underside of host plants. The caterpillar feeds on various rosaceous plants, including Agrimonia eupatoria, Comarum palustre, Filipendula vulgaris, Fragaria vesca, many Potentilla and Rubus, Sanguisorba minor, and so on ( Clarke, 2024; Hernández-Roldán et al., 2012). As soon as it hatches, the caterpillar makes a shelter from a few silk threads and a leaf that it rolls up. As the caterpillar grows, it creates larger and larger shelters ( LSPN, 1999). The caterpillars are often parasitised by parasitoid wasps of the genera Trichogramma, Dolichogenoidea and Cotesia ( Hernández-Roldán et al., 2012).
Pyrgus malvoides overwinters as a pupa, making the butterfly one of the first to fly during the year. While the species generally has two generations (April to June and July to August) in the southern part of its range ( De Jong, 1972; Lafranchis et al., 2015), in central Europe Pyrgus malvoides is generally univoltine ( LSPN, 1999; Wagner, 2006), with one generation from April to August, depending on altitude.
Pyrgus malvoides colonises a wide variety of habitats, from plains to altitudes above 2 400 m, from Mediterranean scrubland to meadows and rough pastures, roadsides, forest edges, abandoned quarries and gravel pits, but also alpine meadows and pastures or marshes. The species prefers areas with patchy vegetation ( LSPN, 1999). The species is common and not globally threatened ( Van Swaay et al., 2010).
Mitochondrial DNA supports substantial cryptic diversity for P. malvoides, with one main clade being associated with the Iberian Peninsula and the other with Italy and the Alps ( Dapporto et al., 2022). Further studies are needed to reconcile these results with the genital differences observed – in particular by de Jong (1972), who considered two subspecies within P. malvoides (ssp. malvoides in most of the range and ssp. modestior in peninsular Italy and Sicily). The contact zones between P. malvoides and P. malvae should also be studied in detail using the latest genetic genomic techniques to assess the degree of reproductive isolation between the two species.
The genome presented here will complement the sequence data already available for Pyrgus malvae ( Hayward et al., 2022), providing the opportunity to also perform comparative genomics within this species complex. The sequence data were derived from a male specimen ( Figure 1) collected from Euseigne VS, Switzerland.
A. Live specimen. B. Voucher photograph of the Pyrgus malvoides (ilPyrMalo1) specimen used for genome sequencing.
Methods
Sample acquisition
The specimen used for genome sequencing was an adult male Pyrgus malvoides (specimen ID SAN28000130, ToLID ilPyrMalo1; Figure 1), collected from Euseigne VS, Switzerland (latitude 46.1773, longitude 7.4159; elevation 800 m) on 26/04/2023. The specimen was collected and identified by Yannick Chittaro (Info Fauna, Neuchâtel, Switzerland).
Nucleic acid extraction
Protocols for high molecular weight (HMW) DNA extraction developed at the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI) Tree of Life Core Laboratory are available on protocols.io ( Howard et al., 2025). The ilPyrMalo1 sample was weighed and triaged to determine the appropriate extraction protocol. Tissue from the thorax was homogenised by powermashing using a PowerMasher II tissue disruptor.
HMW DNA was extracted in the WSI Scientific Operations core using the Automated MagAttract v2 protocol. DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb following the Megaruptor®3 for LI PacBio protocol. Sheared DNA was purified by automated SPRI (solid-phase reversible immobilisation). The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system. For this sample, the final post-shearing DNA had a Qubit concentration of 35.46 ng/μL and a yield of 1 666.62 ng, with a fragment size of 13.3 kb. The 260/280 spectrophotometric ratio was 2.03, and the 260/230 ratio was 3.11.
PacBio HiFi library preparation and sequencing
Library preparation and sequencing were performed at the WSI Scientific Operations core. Libraries were prepared using the SMRTbell Prep Kit 3.0 (Pacific Biosciences, California, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The kit includes reagents for end repair/A-tailing, adapter ligation, post-ligation SMRTbell bead clean-up, and nuclease treatment. Size selection and clean-up were performed using diluted AMPure PB beads (Pacific Biosciences). DNA concentration was quantified using a Qubit Fluorometer v4.0 (ThermoFisher Scientific) and the Qubit 1X dsDNA HS assay kit. Final library fragment size was assessed with the Agilent Femto Pulse Automated Pulsed Field CE Instrument (Agilent Technologies) using the gDNA 55 kb BAC analysis kit.
The sample was sequenced on a Revio instrument (Pacific Biosciences). The prepared library was normalised to 2 nM, and 15 μL was used for making complexes. Primers were annealed and polymerases bound to generate circularised complexes, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Complexes were purified using 1.2X SMRTbell beads, then diluted to the Revio loading concentration (200–300 pM) and spiked with a Revio sequencing internal control. The sample was sequenced on a Revio 25M SMRT cell. The SMRT Link software (Pacific Biosciences), a web-based workflow manager, was used to configure and monitor the run and to carry out primary and secondary data analysis.
Specimen details, sequencing platforms, and data yields are summarised in Table 1.
Hi-C
** Sample preparation and crosslinking **
The Hi-C sample was prepared from 20–50 mg of frozen head tissue of the ilPyrMalo1 sample using the Arima-HiC v2 kit (Arima Genomics). Following the manufacturer’s instructions, tissue was fixed and DNA crosslinked using TC buffer to a final formaldehyde concentration of 2%. The tissue was homogenised using the Diagnocine Power Masher-II. Crosslinked DNA was digested with a restriction enzyme master mix, biotinylated, and ligated. Clean-up was performed with SPRISelect beads before library preparation. DNA concentration was measured with the Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Qubit HS Assay Kit. The biotinylation percentage was estimated using the Arima-HiC v2 QC beads.
** Hi-C library preparation and sequencing **
Biotinylated DNA constructs were fragmented using a Covaris E220 sonicator and size selected to 400–600 bp using SPRISelect beads. DNA was enriched with Arima-HiC v2 kit Enrichment beads. End repair, A-tailing, and adapter ligation were carried out with the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs), following a modified protocol where library preparation occurs while DNA remains bound to the Enrichment beads. Library amplification was performed using KAPA HiFi HotStart mix and a custom Unique Dual Index (UDI) barcode set (Integrated DNA Technologies). Depending on sample concentration and biotinylation percentage determined at the crosslinking stage, libraries were amplified with 10–16 PCR cycles. Post-PCR clean-up was performed with SPRISelect beads. Libraries were quantified using the AccuClear Ultra High Sensitivity dsDNA Standards Assay Kit (Biotium) and a FLUOstar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech).
Prior to sequencing, libraries were normalised to 10 ng/μL. Normalised libraries were quantified again and equimolar and/or weighted 2.8 nM pools. Pool concentrations were checked using the Agilent 4200 TapeStation (Agilent) with High Sensitivity D500 reagents before sequencing. Sequencing was performed using paired-end 150 bp reads on the Illumina NovaSeq X.
Specimen details, sequencing platforms, and data yields are summarised in Table 1.
Genome assembly
Prior to assembly of the PacBio HiFi reads, a database of k-mer counts ( k = 31) was generated from the filtered reads using FastK. GenomeScope2 ( Ranallo-Benavidez et al., 2020) was used to analyse the k-mer frequency distributions, providing estimates of genome size, heterozygosity, and repeat content.
The HiFi reads were assembled using Hifiasm in Hi-C phasing mode ( Cheng et al., 2021; Cheng et al., 2022), producing two haplotypes. Hi-C reads ( Rao et al., 2014) were mapped to the primary contigs using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019). Contigs were further scaffolded with Hi-C data in YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023), using the --break option for handling potential misassemblies. The scaffolded assemblies were evaluated using Gfastats ( Formenti et al., 2022), BUSCO ( Manni et al., 2021) and MERQURY.FK ( Rhie et al., 2020).
The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
Assembly curation
The assembly was decontaminated using the Assembly Screen for Cobionts and Contaminants ( ASCC) pipeline. TreeVal was used to generate the flat files and maps for use in curation. Manual curation was conducted primarily in PretextView and HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018). Scaffolds were visually inspected and corrected as described by Howe et al. (2021). Manual corrections included 12 breaks and 58 joins. The curation process is documented at https://gitlab.com/wtsi-grit/rapid-curation. PretextSnapshot was used to generate a Hi-C contact map of the final assembly.
Assembly quality assessment
Chromosomal painting was performed using lep_busco_painter using Merian elements, which represent the 32 ancestral linkage groups in Lepidoptera ( Wright et al., 2024). Painting was based on gene locations from the lepidoptera_odb10 BUSCO analysis and chromosome lengths from the genome index produced using SAMtools faidx ( Danecek et al., 2021). Each complete BUSCO (including both single-copy and duplicated BUSCOs) was assigned to a Merian element using a reference database, and coloured positions were plotted along chromosomes drawn to scale.
The Merqury.FK tool ( Rhie et al., 2020), run in a Singularity container ( Kurtzer et al., 2017), was used to evaluate k-mer completeness and assembly quality for both haplotypes using the k-mer databases ( k = 31) computed prior to genome assembly. The analysis outputs included assembly QV scores and completeness statistics.
The genome was analysed using the BlobToolKit pipeline, a Nextflow implementation of the earlier Snakemake BlobToolKit pipeline ( Challis et al., 2020). The pipeline aligns PacBio reads using minimap2 ( Li, 2018) and SAMtools ( Danecek et al., 2021) to generate coverage tracks. Simultaneously, it queries the GoaT database ( Challis et al., 2023) to identify relevant BUSCO lineages and runs BUSCO ( Manni et al., 2021). For the three domain-level BUSCO lineages, BUSCO genes are aligned to the UniProt Reference Proteomes database ( Bateman et al., 2023) using DIAMOND blastp ( Buchfink et al., 2021). The genome is divided into chunks based on the density of BUSCO genes from the closest taxonomic lineage, and each chunk is aligned to the UniProt Reference Proteomes database with DIAMOND blastx. Sequences without hits are chunked using seqtk and aligned to the NT database with blastn ( Altschul et al., 1990). The BlobToolKit suite consolidates all outputs into a blobdir for visualisation. The BlobToolKit pipeline was developed using nf-core tooling ( Ewels et al., 2020) and MultiQC ( Ewels et al., 2016), with package management via Conda and Bioconda ( Grüning et al., 2018), and containerisation through Docker ( Merkel, 2014) and Singularity ( Kurtzer et al., 2017).
Genome sequence report
Sequence data
The genome of a specimen of Pyrgus malvoides was sequenced using Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads, generating 38.68 Gb (gigabases) from 3.68 million reads, which were used to assemble the genome. GenomeScope2.0 analysis estimated the haploid genome size at 741.69 Mb, with a heterozygosity of 1.65% and repeat content of 38.03%. These estimates guided expectations for the assembly. Based on the estimated genome size, the sequencing data provided approximately 50× coverage. Hi-C sequencing produced 107.50 Gb from 711.95 million reads, which were used to scaffold the assembly. Table 1 summarises the specimen and sequencing details.
Assembly statistics
The genome was assembled into two haplotypes using Hi-C phasing. Haplotype 1 was curated to chromosome level, while haplotype 2 was assembled to scaffold level. The final assembly has a total length of 746.71 Mb in 82 scaffolds, with 122 gaps, and a scaffold N50 of 27.17 Mb ( Table 2).
Most of the assembly sequence (99.8%) was assigned to 31 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 30 autosomes and the Z sex chromosome. These chromosome-level scaffolds, confirmed by Hi-C data, are named according to size ( Figure 2; Table 3). Chromosome painting with Merian elements illustrates the distribution of orthologues along chromosomes and highlights patterns of chromosomal evolution relative to Lepidopteran ancestral linkage groups ( Figure 3).
Hi-C contact map of the Pyrgus malvoides genome assembly.Assembled chromosomes are shown in order of size and labelled along the axes. The plot was generated using PretextSnapshot.
Table 3.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the haplotype 1 genome assembly of Pyrgus malvoides ilPyrMalo1.
Merian elements painted across chromosomes in the ilPyrMalo1.hap1.1 assembly of Pyrgus malvoides.Chromosomes are drawn to scale, with the positions of orthologues shown as coloured bars. Each orthologue is coloured by the Merian element that it belongs to. All orthologues which could be assigned to Merian elements are shown.
The mitochondrial genome was also assembled. This sequence is included as a contig in the multifasta file of the genome submission and as a standalone record.
Assembly quality metrics
For haplotype 1, the estimated QV is 67.7, and for haplotype 2, 66.8. When the two haplotypes are combined, the assembly achieves an estimated QV of 67.2. The k-mer completeness is 71.37% for haplotype 1, 71.43% for haplotype 2, and 99.52% for the combined haplotypes ( Figure 4). BUSCO analysis using the lepidoptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 5 286) ( Kriventseva et al., 2019) identified 98.6% of the expected gene set (single = 98.2%, duplicated = 0.4%) for haplotype 1. The snail plot in Figure 5 summarises the scaffold length distribution and other assembly statistics for haplotype 1. The blob plot in Figure 6 shows the distribution of scaffolds by GC proportion and coverage for haplotype 1.
Evaluation of k-mer completeness using MerquryFK.This plot illustrates the recovery of k-mers from the original read data in the final assemblies. The horizontal axis represents k-mer multiplicity, and the vertical axis shows the number of k-mers. The black curve represents k-mers that appear in the reads but are not assembled. The green curve (the homozygous peak) corresponds to k-mers shared by both haplotypes and the red and blue curves (the heterozygous peaks) show k-mers found only in one of the haplotypes.
Assembly metrics for ilPyrMalo1.hap1.1.The BlobToolKit snail plot provides an overview of assembly metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The circumference represents the length of the whole genome sequence, and the main plot is divided into 1,000 bins around the circumference. The outermost blue tracks display the distribution of GC, AT, and N percentages across the bins. Scaffolds are arranged clockwise from longest to shortest and are depicted in dark grey. The longest scaffold is indicated by the red arc, and the deeper orange and pale orange arcs represent the N50 and N90 lengths. A light grey spiral at the centre shows the cumulative scaffold count on a logarithmic scale. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated, and missing BUSCO genes in the set is presented at the top right. An interactive version of this figure can be accessed on the BlobToolKit viewer.
BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot for ilPyrMalo1.hap1.1.Blob plot showing sequence coverage (vertical axis) and GC content (horizontal axis). The circles represent scaffolds, with the size proportional to scaffold length and the colour representing phylum membership. The histograms along the axes display the total length of sequences distributed across different levels of coverage and GC content. An interactive version of this figure is available on the BlobToolKit viewer.
Table 4 lists the assembly metric benchmarks adapted from Rhie et al. (2021) the Earth BioGenome Project Report on Assembly Standards September 2024. The EBP metric, calculated for the haplotype 1, is 6.C.Q67, meeting the recommended reference standard.
Table 4.: Earth Biogenome Project summary metrics for the Pyrgus malvoides assembly.
Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Tree of Life collaborator. The Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so, we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:
Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the materialLegality of collection, transfer and use (national and international).
Each transfer of samples is undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Tree of Life collaborator, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances, other Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Aistleitner E : Die Arealgrenzen der beiden Dickkopffalter-Arten Pyrgus malvae L. und Pyrgus malvoides Elw. & Edw. (Lepidoptera Hesperiidae) in Vorarlberg (Österreich) und Liechtenstein. Vorarlb Naturschau. 1996;1:335–44. Reference Source
- 2Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: efficient automated large-scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Altschul SF Gish W Miller W : Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–410. 10.1016/S 0022-2836(05)80360-2 2231712 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Bateman A Martin MJ Orchard S : Uni Prot: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D 1):D 523–D 531. 10.1093/nar/gkac 1052 36408920 PMC 9825514 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Buchfink B Reuter K Drost HG : Sensitive protein alignments at Tree-of-Life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2021;18(4):366–368. 10.1038/s 41592-021-01101-x 33828273 PMC 8026399 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Challis R Kumar S Sotero-Caio C : Genomes on a Tree (Goa T): a versatile, scalable search engine for genomic and sequencing project metadata across the eukaryotic Tree of Life [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 2023;8:24. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18658.1 36864925 PMC 9971660 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit – interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗