Racial disparity in pro-metastatic tumor microenvironment in treatment naïve breast cancer
Priyanka Parmar, Burcu Karadal-Ferrena, Suryansh Shukla, Andrew Miller, Chenxin Zhang, Cien Huang, Timothy D’Alfonso, Rachel Han, Esther Adler, Nurfiza Ladak, Paula S. Ginter, Susan Fineberg, Xianjun Ye, Mindy Ginsberg, Chedva Rosenbaum, Malka Felder, Yu Lin, Xiaoming Chen

TL;DR
Black women with certain breast cancer types have a more pro-metastatic tumor environment than White women, which may explain worse outcomes.
Contribution
This study identifies racial disparities in tumor microenvironment scores linked to metastasis in treatment-naïve breast cancer patients.
Findings
Black patients had significantly higher TMEM doorway scores than White patients in ER+/HER2- and HER2+ breast cancers but not in TNBC.
High TMEM scores in Black ER+/HER2- patients correlated with a 4.6-fold increased risk of distant recurrence compared to White patients with similar scores.
Racial differences in macrophage density aligned with TMEM doorway score disparities.
Abstract
Black women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative (ER + /HER2-) breast cancer experience higher rates of distant recurrence and worse survival outcomes compared to White women. This may be due not only to disparities in social determinants of health, but also differences in the tumor microenvironment (TME), including TMEM (Tumor Microenvironment of Metastasis) doorway score. TMEM doorways serve as portals for cancer cell hematogenous dissemination to distant sites. While higher TMEM doorway scores have been observed in Black (compared to White) patients with residual ER + /HER2- breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, this has not been evaluated in treatment-naïve primary breast cancers. Here, we report on a multi-institutional study to evaluate TMEM doorway score in 418 treatment-naïve archived human breast cancer samples, including 265 patients with ER + /HER2-, 102…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening · Breast Cancer Treatment Studies · Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
