The rationale for removing typification from virus taxonomy
Stuart G. Siddell

TL;DR
This paper explains why the practice of typification was removed from virus taxonomy and evaluates its relevance.
Contribution
The paper provides a rationale for abolishing typification in virus taxonomy, a change recently implemented by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses.
Findings
Typification was historically used to ensure nomenclatural stability in taxonomy.
The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses removed the requirement for type species in virus taxonomy in 2021.
The paper argues that typification is no longer necessary for virological practice.
Abstract
Typification, the linkage of a name-bearing “type” to a taxon and the description and deposition of a corresponding type specimen, has been a principle of biological taxonomy for over two centuries. It was introduced to promote nomenclatural uniformity and stability. Until recently, a modified form of typification was also written in the rules governing the taxonomy of viruses. However, in 2021, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses abolished all type species and removed the requirement to designate a type species when a new genus is created. In this article, I briefly review the history of typification, explain its purpose and evaluate its relevance to current virological practice.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacteriophages and microbial interactions · Plant and Fungal Interactions Research · Plant Virus Research Studies
