Deepening ideas vs. exploring new ones: AI strategy effects in human-AI creative collaboration
Kazuki Komura, Seiji Yamada, Md. Rabiul Awal, Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej, Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej, Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej

TL;DR
This paper explores how AI can best collaborate with humans in creative tasks by comparing strategies that either deepen existing ideas or explore new ones.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel framework for AI-human collaboration, showing that deepening ideas builds more trust and encourages adoption.
Findings
The deepening strategy significantly improved user trust and idea adoption compared to diversification.
Predictable AI behavior in deepening ideas led to more effective collaboration.
AI should act as a supportive partner, not a competitor, to enhance human creativity.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly participates in creative processes, designing effective human-AI collaboration is crucial. This study addresses a fundamental question: Should an AI partner prioritize deepening existing ideas (exploitation) or diversifying the creative space (exploration)? We investigated this through a controlled experiment with 148 participants, comparing two AI strategies based on March’s exploration-exploitation framework. Using a turn-based brainstorming system on the topic of “how to increase café sales,” we measured each AI strategy’s impact on human trust and idea adoption. Contrary to traditional creativity research that emphasizes divergence, our findings show that the convergent deepening strategy significantly outperformed the diversification approach in both building user trust and encouraging idea adoption. We found that the AI’s predictable…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpen Source Software Innovations · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · AI in Service Interactions
