Protocol for evaluation of Movember’s scaling what works grant funding program: Supporting the delivery of mental health interventions for men & boys in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom
Thomas Steele, Chloe Ang, Vanessa Rose, Gayatri Kembhavi, Jamie Rowland, Maryanna Abdo, Janell Kwok, Katherine Young, Sophie Merryfull, Sara Whittaker, Natasha Brusco, Rhiannon Watt, Cara Büsst, Dirceu Mabunda, Dirceu Mabunda

TL;DR
This paper outlines a plan to evaluate a mental health grant program for men and boys in three countries, focusing on how well it works and how it can be scaled up.
Contribution
The study introduces a tailored scalability assessment tool and a structured evaluation protocol for mental health interventions in grant-funded programs.
Findings
The evaluation will assess implementation, effectiveness, cost, and scalability of 17 mental health projects.
A universal outcome measure, the Personal Wellbeing Index, will be used across all projects.
The study will inform best practices for scaling mental health interventions in grant-funded contexts.
Abstract
Mental ill health among men and boys is a significant global issue, with barriers to recognising symptoms, seeking help, and accessing services. In response, Movember launched the Scaling What Works (SWW) grant funding in 2022. This initiative supports 17 diverse mental health projects across Australia, Canada, and the UK, targeting communities, schools, and workplaces to address the varied needs and contexts of men and boys. Our evaluation protocol outlines the approach to assessing the SWW program across four domains: implementation, effectiveness, cost (implementation and cost-effectiveness), and scalability. Using the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT) as a framework, we aim to embed scalability considerations into the evaluation design. Data will be collected qualitatively and quantitatively from project participants, facilitators, and Movember staff throughout the…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Treatment and Access · Health Policy Implementation Science · Gender Roles and Identity Studies
