A patient-centric paradigm and tool for clinical research: the DOOR is open
Toshimitsu Hamasaki, Yijie He, Qihang Wu, Jessica Howard-Anderson, Helen W. Boucher, Sarah B. Doernberg, Thomas L. Holland, John H. Powers, Jing Wang, Guoqing Diao, David van Duin, Vance G. Fowler, Henry F. Chambers, Scott R. Evans

TL;DR
The DOOR paradigm offers a patient-centric approach to clinical trials that better evaluates treatment benefits and risks.
Contribution
DOOR introduces a new paradigm and tool for clinical research that integrates patient-centric benefit:risk evaluation.
Findings
Standard clinical trial methods often fail to address key clinical questions about patient outcomes.
DOOR provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing and comparing patient experiences across treatments.
A freely available online tool supports the implementation of the DOOR paradigm.
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard for evaluating the benefits and harms of interventions and yet may not provide the evidence needed to inform medical decision-making, an ultimate goal for clinical research. Commonly used design and analysis approaches are often not suited to answer the most important questions to inform clinical practice, specifically how do resulting patient experiences, when comprehensively considering benefits and harms, compare between therapeutic alternatives? The standard approach of siloed analysis of one outcome at a time: (i) does not incorporate associations between multiple outcomes; (ii) does not recognize the cumulative nature of multiple outcomes in individual patients or recognize important gradations of global patient response; (iii) suffers from competing risk complexities during interpretation of individual outcomes; (iv) provides for…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Cancer survivorship and care
