Patients’ experiences of video consultations: A qualitative systematic review

TL;DR

This review explores how patients experience video consultations, highlighting their benefits and challenges, especially during the pandemic.

Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive synthesis of qualitative data on patient experiences with video consultations.

Findings

Video consultations are ideal for less complex issues but face challenges with emotional topics and technical problems.

Patients feel empowered in focused conversations but may experience vulnerability and distance.

Success depends on technology, time, and emotional support, with VC best used to complement traditional care.

Abstract

Video consultation (VC) became vital for improving healthcare access during COVID-19 pandemic and remains so. Despite evidence of effectiveness, concerns including technology literacy and inconsistencies in experience highlight the need for larger, patient-focused studies. While patients appreciate the convenience of VC, challenges during complex issues and patients’ preferences for in-person care persists. Synthesising qualitative studies offers insights into the fragmented understanding of patient experiences with VC. This review explores adult patients’ experiences of VC.

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 2011 and 2024 and reported according to the PRISMA statement. Study quality was assessed using the CASP checklist, and data were analysed through thematic synthesis. Confidence in the findings was evaluated using GRADE-CERQual.

In total, 3203 unique studies were retrieved; 13 were included in the final synthesis, resulting in four main themes: (1) suitable for less complex issues when technical problems can be solved; (2) feeling secure, relaxed, and having mutual focus in an equitable partnership; (3) limitations regarding personal needs and practical help; and (4) increased vulnerability and lack of emotional feedback.

VC is experienced as ideal for managing less complex issues but is challenging for emotional topics due to technical concerns. It empowers patients by providing a neutral place for focused conversations but can create vulnerability and distance that can challenge the patient–professional relationship. Success requires technological adaptation, sufficient time during VC, and emotional support. VC should complement – not replace – traditional care, with its use determined in dialogue with patients.

Figures