# Multi-criteria group shilling attacks

**Authors:** Tugba Turkoglu Kaya, Joanna Tindall, Qinglin Meng, Qinglin Meng

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338319 · PLOS One · 2025-12-11

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new type of attack on group recommendation systems and shows how to make them more robust against such attacks.

## Contribution

The paper proposes a novel multi-criteria group shilling attack model and evaluates its impact on system robustness.

## Key findings

- The proposed multi-criteria system improves robustness with up to 12% higher average hit ratio on the YM20 dataset.
- The MUP-NNZ strategy shows consistent resistance to profile injection attacks.
- This work fills a critical research gap in multi-criteria group recommendation system robustness.

## Abstract

The rapid advancement of technology has enabled the collection of detailed, multi-dimensional user data, paving the way for multi-criteria recommendation systems that consider diverse aspects of user preferences. While traditional recommendation systems aim to satisfy individual users, group recommendation systems are designed to generate suggestions that accommodate the collective preferences of a group. However, the increasing prevalence of group interactions in digital environments has also introduced new vulnerabilities, such as group shilling attacks, where coordinated malicious users manipulate recommendation outcomes. This study conducts the first comprehensive robustness analysis of multi-criteria group recommender systems, addressing a critical research gap. A novel shilling attack strategy is proposed by adapting the group shilling model to multi-criteria settings, allowing a deeper understanding of the risks these systems face. Experimental results indicate that the proposed multi-criteria recommender system achieves notable robustness across datasets. Specifically, the average hit ratio (AvgHR) increases up to approximately 12% on the YM20 dataset and reaches around 15% on the YM10 dataset. Furthermore, among the target item selection strategies, the MUP-NNZ method consistently demonstrates superior resistance to profile injection attacks, confirming its effectiveness in maintaining recommendation accuracy under adversarial conditions.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** ABCC1 (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 1 (ABCC1 blood group)) [NCBI Gene 4363] {aka ABC29, ABCC, DFNA77, GS-X, MRP, MRP1}, TRIM37 (tripartite motif containing 37) [NCBI Gene 4591] {aka MUL, POB1, TEF3}, MUPP (major urinary protein, pseudogene) [NCBI Gene 100129193] {aka MUP}
- **Diseases:** RS (MESH:D001480), poisoning (MESH:D011041)
- **Chemicals:** GSA (-), MC (MESH:C061001)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Cell lines:** S2 — Drosophila melanogaster (Fruit fly), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_Z232)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12774353/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12774353/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12774353/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12774353