# The impact of heat inactivation on RT-per detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): an experience from the University Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Serbia

**Authors:** Jelena Stojčević Maletić, Iva Barjaktarović, Ljiljana Andrijević, Katarina Bačulov, Slobodanka Bogdanović Vasić, Diandra Pintać Šarac

PMC · DOI: 10.2478/aiht-2025-76-3973 · Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology · 2025-12-30

## TL;DR

This study shows that heat inactivation at 56°C for 30 minutes does not significantly affect SARS-CoV-2 detection in most samples but may reduce sensitivity in low viral load cases.

## Contribution

The study provides empirical evidence on the impact of heat inactivation on RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples.

## Key findings

- Heat inactivation did not significantly affect the overall SARS-CoV-2 detection rate (55.5% vs. 55.0%).
- Discrepancies occurred in 15.3% of samples, particularly those with Cq values >31.
- Heat inactivation slightly altered Cq values for RdRp, E, and N genes, with significant changes in strongly positive samples.

## Abstract

Handling clinical samples from patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection puts healthcare workers at risk of exposure to infectious particles. To reduce this risk, samples are often heat-inactivated before nucleic acid isolation, but this procedure may affect the analytical sensitivity of the test. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effects of heat inactivation (56 °C for 30 min) on RT-qPCR results of samples taken from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal (NP/OP) swabs collected from 200 symptomatic patients. Each sample was split into two aliquots – one subjected to heat inactivation and the other stored at 4 °C – followed by nucleic acid isolation and RT-qPCR analysis using the GeneFinder COVID-19 nucleic acid test. Heat inactivation did not significantly affect the overall SARS-CoV-2 detection rate (55.5 % vs. 55.0 % in untreated and heat-treated groups; χ2=0.01; p=0.91). However, discrepancies occurred in 15.3 % of samples, all with quantification cycle (Cq) values >31, including target loss, gain, or complete signal disappearance after heat treatment. Heat inactivation also slightly decreased Cq values for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and envelope (E) genes and increased those for the nucleocapsid (N) gene, with significant changes in strongly positive samples (Cq≤33). In positive samples (Cq≤40), the human ribonuclease (RNase) P gene also exhibited significantly higher Cq values after heat treatment. In the strongly positive subgroup, correlation analysis showed moderate correlation for RdRp and very strong correlation for the N and E genes, and a weaker correlation for weakly positive samples. In conclusion, heat inactivation at 56 °C for 30 min does not significantly affect viral gene detection but may diminish it in samples with low viral load.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) [NCBI Gene 30897989], LOC124901580 (endogenous retrovirus group K member 6 Env polyprotein) [NCBI Gene 124901580]

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** N (nucleocapsid phosphoprotein) [NCBI Gene 43740575], ORF1ab (ORF1a polyprotein;ORF1ab polyprotein) [NCBI Gene 43740578], E (envelope protein) [NCBI Gene 43740570]
- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (no rank) [taxon 2697049]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12772480/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12772480/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12772480/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12772480