Correction for Funk et al., “Comparison of ceftriaxone versus ceftaroline in combination with ampicillin or penicillin against Enterococcus faecalis”
Olivia Gladys Funk, Ruhma Khan, Zeel Shah, Jaclyn A. Cusumano
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Fig 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus · Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy · Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AUTHOR CORRECTION
Volume 13, no. 6, e0271824, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02718-24. Page 3, Paragraph 3: “…were statistically significantly less likely…” should read “…were less likely…”
Page 5: Fig. 2 should appear as shown in this correction. The percentages displayed in Fig. 2A were adjusted for ampicillin-ceftaroline and penicillin-ceftriaxone and in Fig. 2B were adjusted for ampicillin-ceftriaxone and ampicillin-ceftaroline. These errors occurred due to an incorrect data entry in the Excel file with the corresponding figure. However, they do not affect the conclusions of the manuscript.
**