# In vitro effect of mouthwash containing chlorhexidine and chlorine dioxide against halitosis pathogens

**Authors:** Thao Thi Phuong Tran, Thuy Anh Vu Pham

PMC · DOI: 10.2340/biid.v13.45222 · Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry · 2026-01-02

## TL;DR

This study tests mouthwashes with chlorhexidine and chlorine dioxide to see how well they fight bacteria that cause bad breath.

## Contribution

The study identifies effective low-dose chlorhexidine-chlorine dioxide combinations for halitosis pathogens.

## Key findings

- Low-dose CHX with 0.05% CDO showed strong antibacterial effects against halitosis-related bacteria.
- Formulations with 0.05% CDO and varying CHX concentrations had the largest inhibition zones and favorable MIC values.
- Time-kill tests confirmed sustained bactericidal effects of low-concentration CHX/CDO combinations.

## Abstract

This study evaluated the antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine-chlorine dioxide (CHX-CDO) mouthwash formulations against major halitosis-related pathogens: Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), and Eikenella corrodens (Ec).

Five bacterial strains were cultured anaerobically. Experimental mouthwashes with varying concentrations of CHX (0.01–0.2%) and CDO (0.05–0.1%), labeled solution A–J, were tested. Agar diffusion assays measured inhibition zones. MICs were determined by broth microdilution with 24 h anaerobic incubation and OD600 measurement. The time-kill test quantified CFUs from serial dilutions at time points (0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h).

All CHX-CDO mouthwash combinations inhibited bacterial growth, with A (0.05% CHX + 0.05% CDO), C (0.2% CHX + 0.05% CDO), F (0.2% CHX + 0.1% CDO), and J (CHX 0.02/CDO 0.1) showing the largest inhibition zones and G (CHX 0.01/CDO 0.05) and H (CHX 0.02/CDO 0.05) exhibiting the most favorable MIC values. Time-kill assays confirmed sustained bactericidal effects for low concentration-CHX/0.05% CDO formulations. Significant differences in antibacterial activity were observed among the formulations (p < 0.05).

Low-dose CHX combined with 0.05% CDO mouthwash maintains antibacterial efficacy against halitosis-associated pathogens, suggesting a promising CHX dose reduction while preserving effectiveness.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** chlorhexidine (PubChem CID 9552079), chlorine dioxide (PubChem CID 24870)
- **Species:** Porphyromonas gingivalis (taxon 837), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (taxon 714), Fusobacterium nucleatum (taxon 851), Prevotella intermedia (taxon 28131), Eikenella corrodens (taxon 539)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** halitosis (MESH:D006209)
- **Chemicals:** CDO (MESH:C029663), chlorine dioxide (MESH:C025109), chlorhexidine (MESH:D002710), CHX (-)
- **Species:** Fusobacterium nucleatum (species) [taxon 851], Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (species) [taxon 714], Eikenella corrodens (species) [taxon 539], Prevotella intermedia (species) [taxon 28131], Porphyromonas gingivalis (species) [taxon 837]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12771022/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12771022/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12771022/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12771022