# Enhancing Gluten‐Free Bread With Whole Flours From Forage Palm, Buckwheat, and Teff: Physicochemical Composition, Technological Properties, and Sensory Evaluation

**Authors:** Mateus Alves Araújo, Nathalia de Andrade Neves, Irene Andressa, Tatiana Nunes Amaral, Marcio Schmiele

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.70812 · Journal of Food Science · 2026-01-05

## TL;DR

This study explores using forage palm, buckwheat, and teff flours to enhance gluten-free bread, focusing on nutritional and sensory qualities.

## Contribution

The study introduces optimized gluten-free bread formulations using forage palm, buckwheat, and teff flours, highlighting their unique nutritional and sensory benefits.

## Key findings

- Buckwheat flour had the highest protein content (11.58%), forage palm flour had the highest fiber and ash content (17.92%), and teff flour had the highest carbohydrate content (77.06%).
- Bread formulations with teff were more accepted in sensory evaluation due to softer texture and stronger flavor.
- Forage palm flour subtly altered bread color without affecting appearance or aroma ratings.

## Abstract

The increasing demand for gluten‐free foods has driven the formulation of baked products using alternative raw materials to replace wheat. This study aimed to characterize the whole flours of forage palm, teff, and buckwheat, as well as evaluate their performance in gluten‐free breads. Proximate analyses of the flours were conducted, in addition to the characterization of the batters and the breads developed. The results indicated that buckwheat flour exhibited the highest protein content (11.58%), forage palm flour stood out for its elevated fiber and ash content (17.92%), and teff flour presented the highest total carbohydrate content (77.06%). Based on the obtained data, optimized bread formulations (with and without teff flours) were developed and subjected to proximate and sensory analyses. Both formulations exhibited similar compositions regarding moisture, proteins, and lipids, although they significantly differed in dietary fiber content, which was higher in the formulation without teff (11.44%) compared to the one with teff (8.56%). Sensory evaluation revealed greater acceptance of the formulation containing teff, attributed to its softer texture and more pronounced flavor. The color of the bread varied subtly due to the presence of forage palm whole flour, without compromising appearance and aroma attributes, which were similarly well rated in both formulations.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** lipids (MESH:D008055), carbohydrate (MESH:D002241)
- **Species:** Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat, species) [taxon 3617]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12770811/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12770811/full.md

## References

81 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12770811/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12770811