# Retrospective duration judgments of naturalistic events depend on memories of event boundaries

**Authors:** Winny W. Y. Yue, Jing Liu, Ziqing Yao, Yuqi Zhang, Zexuan Mu, Xiaoqing Hu

PMC · DOI: 10.3758/s13423-025-02833-z · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · 2026-01-05

## TL;DR

People's memory of event boundaries, not content, mainly affects how they judge the duration of past events.

## Contribution

The study reveals how event structure, not content, influences duration judgments in naturalistic settings.

## Key findings

- Recall of event structure, like the number of subevents, affects duration judgments of whole events.
- Duration judgments of individual subevents depend on the accuracy of gist and details recalled immediately.
- Delayed duration judgments of subevents tend to average out, with less impact from memory changes.

## Abstract

Daily planning and goal-directed behavior rely on accurate judgments of the duration of past experience. However, retrospective duration judgments are often inaccurate. At the same time, our memory of these experiences transforms over time, with memory forgetting being a common occurrence. In this case, whether and how changes in episodic memory impact duration judgments? Here, participants watched videos depicting daily events with clear boundaries segmenting each subevent. Participants then completed recall and duration judgment tasks both immediately and after 7 days. For whole events, results showed that the recall of the event structure, specifically the number of subevents, significantly influenced immediate and delayed duration judgments. In contrast, event content memories, including gist and recalled details, had no major impact on the entire event duration. In contrast, duration judgments of individual subevents depend on the recall of event content, with immediate judgments linked to recalled gist accuracy and detail richness, while delayed judgments tend to average out, with no significant effect from change in recalled details. Together, these results suggest that retrospective duration judgments rely on explicit episodic memory recall, with the type of recall varying depending on the size and complexity of the naturalistic event. While the segmented structure provides a consistent basis for duration judgments of complex events, single subevents without internal boundaries rely more on granular details.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-025-02833-z.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** mental illness (MESH:D001523), color (MESH:D003117), memory impairments (MESH:D008569), neurological disorders (MESH:D009461), Alzheimer's disease (MESH:D000544), LMM (MESH:D004195), brain injury (MESH:D001930)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12769706/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12769706/full.md

## References

2 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12769706/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12769706