# First-line treatments for BCG-naïve non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Navid Roessler, Brigida A. Maiorano, Marcin Miszczyk, Keiichiro Miyajima, Shota Inoue, Markus von Deimling, Malte W. Vetterlein, Margit Fisch, Marco Moschini, Pawel Rajwa, Andrea Necchi, Morgan Roupret, Benjamin Pradere, David D’Andrea, Paolo Gontero, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Shahrokh F. Shariat

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-06180-5 · World Journal of Urology · 2026-01-05

## TL;DR

This study finds that combining systemic immune treatments with bladder cancer therapy improves outcomes but increases severe side effects.

## Contribution

The study evaluates first-line combination therapies for BCG-naïve non-muscle invasive bladder cancer using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

## Key findings

- Systemic ICIs added to BCG reduced recurrence-related events but increased severe adverse events.
- Modifications to intravesical BCG alone did not significantly improve outcomes.
- High-grade recurrence-free survival did not reach statistical significance in sensitivity analysis.

## Abstract

To evaluate novel intravesical and systemic combination therapies for improving outcomes in BCG-naïve patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), this systematic review and meta-analysis assessed first-line treatment strategies, including combinations with systemic immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

In this prospectively registered review (CRD420251163026), MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the ESMO 2025 abstract book were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line therapies in BCG-naïve NMIBC. Meta-analyses estimated HRs for recurrence-related time-to-event outcomes (disease-free and event-free survival). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were pooled as relative risks (RRs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool.

Out of 5202 records screened, six RCTs including 3485 patients were eligible. Modifications to intravesical BCG alone (three trials, n = 895) did not significantly improve recurrence-related outcomes. Systemic ICIs given additional to intravesical BCG significantly reduced recurrence-related events compared to BCG alone (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.6–0.97, n = 1899; number needed to treat at two years: 25), but increased grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events by a statistically and clinically significant margin (RR 3.97, 95% CI 2.53–6.22, n = 1879; number needed to treat to harm one patient: 5). Sensitivity analysis using the ALBAN alternative endpoint of high-grade recurrence-free survival yielded HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.59–1.02), not reaching statistical significance. Limitations included heterogeneity in trial design and endpoint definitions.

In BCG-naïve NMIBC, systemic ICIs combined with intravesical BCG improve recurrence-related outcomes but are offset by a substantially increased risk of severe treatment-related adverse events. These findings highlight the need for careful, risk-based, biomarker-guided patient selection to balance over- and undertreatment within a shared decision-making process.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-025-06180-5.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** bladder cancer (MONDO:0004986)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** bladder cancer (MESH:D001749)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12769649/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12769649/full.md

## References

7 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12769649/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12769649