# Quality of Conventional versus Artificial Intelligence Oral Surgery Consent Forms: Comparative Analysis

**Authors:** Jan Gaessler, Bernhard Remschmidt, Ann-Kathrin Jopp, Behrouz Arefnia, Adrian Franke, Marcus Rieder

PMC · DOI: 10.2196/59851 · Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2026-01-05

## TL;DR

AI-generated consent forms for oral surgery are better than traditional ones, but both need improvement for full comprehension.

## Contribution

This study compares AI-generated and conventional consent forms for oral surgery, revealing differences in quality and readability.

## Key findings

- AI-generated consent forms showed higher quality and better readability than conventional forms.
- Both AI and conventional forms failed to meet recommended comprehension levels for patients.

## Abstract

Artificial intelligence–generated informed consent forms for oral surgery demonstrated higher quality and better readability than conventional web-based forms, though both fell short of recommended comprehension levels.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** LLMs (MESH:D007806), MR (MESH:D008944)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12768391/full.md

## References

10 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12768391/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12768391