# Feasibility of glycated haemoglobin target-setting in adults with diabetes: A mixed-methods study

**Authors:** Samuel J. Westall, Simon Watmough, Ram Prakash Narayanan, Greg Irving, Kevin John Hardy, Yee Gary Ang, Yee Gary Ang, Yee Gary Ang, Yee Gary Ang

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317162 · PLOS One · 2026-01-05

## TL;DR

This study tested whether setting specific blood sugar targets for adults with diabetes is a feasible approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods to assess its practicality and psychological impact.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the feasibility of a mixed-methods approach to evaluating HbA1c target-setting in diabetes management.

## Key findings

- No significant between-group differences were observed in HbA1c or patient-reported outcomes.
- Diabetes distress decreased and self-efficacy improved across groups.
- Interviews showed high acceptability and identified motivators and demotivators for target-setting.

## Abstract

HbA1c targets guide diabetes management to reduce complications, yet their psychological effects are poorly understood. This feasibility study evaluated the practicality of conducting a definitive trial evaluating the impact of explicit HbA1c target-setting in adults with diabetes.

We conducted a randomised mixed-methods feasibility study. Adults with diabetes were allocated 1:1 to receive an explicit HbA1c target set 5 mmol/mol above (Group A) or below (Group B) their current HbA1c. Biomedical (HbA1c, blood pressure, BMI) and psychometric patient-reported outcomes were measured at baseline and 3 months. Quantitative data were analysed in SPSS using independent-sample t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons, and paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group changes. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with patients and healthcare professionals were analysed using the Framework Method of thematic analysis in NVivo. Acceptability was assessed via interview, and mixed-methods findings were integrated through triangulation to enhance validity.

Fifty participants were recruited; 34% withdrew. Though not powered to determine statistical significance, no between-group differences were observed in HbA1c or patient-reported outcomes. Across groups, diabetes distress decreased, self-efficacy improved, and HbA1c improved. Interviews indicated high acceptability and identified key motivators (target achievability, hypoglycaemia avoidance) and demotivators (limited understanding, perceived unattainability).

A randomised mixed-methods approach to HbA1c target-setting is feasible and acceptable, providing methodological insights for a definitive trial.

The study is registered with the ISRCTN (registration number: 12461724; date registered: 11th June 2021).

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** diabetes (MONDO:0005015)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** diabetes (MESH:D003920)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12768356/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12768356/full.md

## References

68 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12768356/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12768356