Editorial Note: Risk of stillbirth in singleton fetuses with advancing gestational age at term: A 10-year experience of late third trimester prenatal screenings of 50,000 deliveries in a referral center in northern Italy
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics · Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy · Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
The PLOS One Editors issue this Editorial Note because this article [1] was identified as one of a series of submissions for which we have concerns about aspects of the peer review process. Readers are advised to interpret the article [1] with caution.
The Editors have no evidence of any author involvement in the peer review concerns.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1D’Ambrosi F, Ruggiero M, Cesano N, Di Maso M, Cetera GE, Tassis B, et al. Risk of stillbirth in singleton fetuses with advancing gestational age at term: A 10-year experience of late third trimester prenatal screenings of 50,000 deliveries in a referral center in northern Italy. P Lo S One. 2023;18(2):e 0277262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277262 36812250 PMC 9946230 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗