Bridging barriers, integrating insights: The Gotham approach to CTSA collaborative evaluation
Cathleen T. Kane, Elana E. Lipschitz, Zainab Abedin, Kawthar Muhammad, Brian J. Nickerson, Gina Rhim, Claudia Lechuga, Jonathan N. Tobin, Maija N. Neville-Williams, Chen Lyu, Alden Yuanhong Lai

TL;DR
This paper explores how voluntary collaboration among research hubs can improve data-sharing and evaluation in translational science.
Contribution
The study introduces a voluntary, sustainable model for multi-hub data-sharing and evaluation without national mandates.
Findings
Education engagement percentages were stable across NYC hubs despite institutional differences.
Collaboration fostered professional relationships and strengthened evaluation capacity.
The model demonstrates potential for overcoming data silos in translational science.
Abstract
Collaboration across the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium is essential for advancing translational science, yet institutional silos often hinder data-sharing and benchmarking efforts. This study examines the viability of a voluntary, multi-hub analysis of the CTSA education common metric on trainee and scholar engagement across five New York City-based sites or “hubs.” Using a structured framework for collaboration and field-tested operational guidelines, a team of evaluators dubbed “The Gotham Group” pooled de-identified common education data to assess post-training research engagement and demographic representation. Their primary objective was to establish a sustainable model for independent data-sharing without national mandates or technical support. A secondary goal was to reassess the metric’s usefulness as an impact benchmark. Results showed that NYC…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth and Medical Research Impacts · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Sciences Research and Education
