Impact of comorbidity burden on outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group analysis
Jonas Sundermeyer, Song Li, Van‐Khue Ton, Rachna Kataria, Elric Zweck, Kevin John, Manreet K. Kanwar, Jaime Hernandez‐Montfort, Shashank S. Sinha, A. Reshad Garan, Jacob Abraham, Vanessa Blumer, Ajar Kochar, Karthikeyan Ranganathan, Gavin W. Hickey, Mohit Pahuja, Scott Lundgren

TL;DR
This study shows that having more health conditions worsens outcomes for patients in cardiogenic shock, especially for those with heart failure-related shock.
Contribution
The study introduces a new risk index (COMRI-CS) to assess how comorbidities affect mortality in cardiogenic shock.
Findings
Comorbidity burden was present in 89.3% of patients and increased in-hospital mortality.
HF-CS patients had a 122% higher mortality risk with high comorbidity burden compared to AMI-CS patients.
The COMRI-CS score showed a 5.5% increase in mortality risk per point.
Abstract
Comorbidity burden is a major determinant of outcomes. Its prognostic impact on cardiogenic shock (CS) across CS subtypes remains insufficiently characterized. We aimed to characterize the prevalence and distribution of comorbidities in CS, assess their impacts on outcomes, and identify high‐risk comorbidity patterns in all‐cause, acute myocardial infarction‐related (AMI‐CS) and heart failure‐related CS (HF‐CS). Cardiogenic shock patients from the multicentre Cardiogenic Shock Working Group (CSWG) registry (2020–2024) were analysed. We used adjusted logistic regression models to assess the impact of comorbidities individually, in combination, and as a cumulative burden on in‐hospital mortality. We developed the Comorbidity Risk Index for Cardiogenic Shock (COMRI‐CS) to capture the association between comorbidities and CS mortality. Among 6815 patients (26.5% AMI‐CS, 53.6% HF‐CS), 6087…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMechanical Circulatory Support Devices · Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair · Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
