Trans*forming the Life Course: New Directions for Critical Gerontology
Jen Justice

TL;DR
This paper challenges traditional aging models by rethinking life timelines through a queer and trans* lens to address cultural biases.
Contribution
It proposes a theoretical transformation of the life course perspective to include non-normative identities and aging experiences.
Findings
Traditional life course models enforce Western norms that marginalize non-linear aging paths.
Deviation from normative timelines is framed as personal failure, not cultural difference.
A trans*-informed approach redefines time and aging as nonlinear and multidirectional.
Abstract
The life course perspective proposes life timelines to which individuals must adhere in order to minimize disruptions to their developmental trajectory and age optimally. These normative timelines are constructed and enforced with the ultimate goal of upholding traditional Western values such as reproductive futurity and capitalistic productivity. The framework is predicated on the assumption of a homogenous society; equal opportunity and desire to access each life transition is assumed and thus deviation in their sequence or timing is seen as a personal failure rather than cultural difference. The life course perspective introduces normative constructions of time that lack applicability to individuals of non-normative identities, whose lives often do not follow the linear and teleological progression proposed by the model, instead unfolding in nonlinear, nonconsecutive, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAging and Gerontology Research · Identity, Memory, and Therapy · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
