The Effect of Discordance Between Felt Age and Ideal Age on Subjective Well-being
Isu Cho, Hyung In Park

TL;DR
This study explores how the mismatch between how old people feel and how old they wish to be affects their happiness and health.
Contribution
The study introduces subjective age discordance (SAD) as a novel measure of well-being distinct from prior age discrepancy research.
Findings
Greater felt age compared to ideal age predicted lower future life satisfaction.
Higher subjective age discordance was linked to increased depression.
The effects of SAD on well-being were stronger in younger adults than in older adults.
Abstract
The discrepancy between felt age and ideal age is termed as subjective age discordance (SAD). According to self-discrepancy theory, individuals tend to feel frustrated from experiencing discrepancies between how they perceive themselves and what they desire, which in turn can be associated with decreased well-being. Based on this theory, SAD is proposed to capture the status quo of individual well-being, separate from the discordance between felt age and chronological age that previous literature has been extensively tested. The current study examined the relationship between SAD and indicators of subjective well-being (i.e., life satisfaction, depression, and self-reported physical health) using polynomial regressions and response surface graphs. Data were collected from 318 Korean adults (aged 40 to 79) who responded twice with a 3-month interval. Results showed that a greater felt…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAging and Gerontology Research · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
