Nursing Homes as Insurers? The Effect of Provider-Led Institutional Special Needs Plans
Amanda Chen, David Grabowski

TL;DR
Nursing homes offering provider-led insurance plans increased enrollment but also affected care quality and hospital use.
Contribution
This study introduces new evidence on the impact of provider-led I-SNPs on nursing home enrollment and care outcomes.
Findings
Provider-led I-SNPs increased enrollment by 17.0 percentage points compared to control nursing homes.
Offering provider-led I-SNPs decreased hospitalizations by 18.2% and increased hypnotic drug use by 30.3%.
Pressure ulcer reporting increased by 15.6% in nursing homes offering provider-led I-SNPs.
Abstract
Institutional Special Needs Plans (I-SNPs) are a type of Medicare Advantage (MA) plan that allow insurers in MA to differentiate their benefits exclusively for long-term residents of nursing homes. When I-SNPs were first offered in 2006, the early I-SNP models were insurer-led as the plan was primarily at-risk for long-stay residents’ Medicare spending. Today however, nursing homes have increasingly been entering the I-SNP market with I-SNP models differentiated based on the level of risk borne by the insurer and nursing home. We use a difference-in-differences design to estimate the effect of offering a provider-led I-SNP on enrollment and quality of care. Using Medicare claims and the Minimum Data Set resident assessments from 2004-2021, we find that offering a provider-led I-SNP led to a 17.0 percentage point increase in I-SNP enrollment among facility residents within four years…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
