Developing an Assistive Technology for Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A User-Centered Approach

TL;DR

This paper explores how older adults with mild cognitive impairment feel about an assistive technology system called SPARC designed to help with daily tasks and cognitive health.

Contribution

The study provides new insights into PwMCI attitudes and preferences for AT design through user-centered focus groups.

Findings

Participants favored the 'all-in-one' nature of SPARC for activity support and education.

Barriers to adoption included privacy concerns and perceived relevance of social features.

Ease of use and integration with existing tools were emphasized as critical for success.

Abstract

Assistive technology (AT) holds great potential to increase independence for older adults, specifically persons with mild cognitive impairment (PwMCI). MCI affects approximately 20% of individuals aged 50 and above. Despite this prevalence, the existing literature does not include robust information on their attitudes, perceived needs, or desires regarding AT. We conducted six focus groups across two sites (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Weill Cornell Medicine). There were 20 total participants: 6 male, 14 female, aged 60-85, with a TICS-M score between 22-37, indicative of some level of cognitive impairment. The goal of the group discussions was to develop recommendations for an AT system, called SPARC (Supporting Personal Activities and Reinforcing Cognition). The SPARC system offers features designed to aid PwMCI in completing complex activities of daily living, support their cognitive health, increase social engagement, and provide educational opportunities. Discussions focused on content, ease of use, relevance, and integration with other tools. Participants responded favorably to the “all-in-one” nature of the system. They showed some hesitation about potential effort and determination needed to adopt the system. The activity support and education features were well-received. Participants discussed potential barriers to adoption for the social and reminiscence features, most common being relevance to them, ease of use, privacy concerns, and integration with current approaches. These findings underscore the importance of assessing PwMCI’s attitudes and opinions during the early stages of the design process, which will impact the adoption and success of the SPARC or other systems intended to support their needs.