# Enhancing Activity Engagement to Optimize Medicare Home Health Patient Outcomes: A Pilot RCT

**Authors:** Chiung-ju Liu, Dorian Rose, Peihua Qiu, Zibo Tian, Alexandra Armstrong, Yvonne Lu

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3925 · 2025-12-31

## TL;DR

A pilot study tested a home-based program to improve Medicare patients' motor skills during home health therapy but found no significant benefits over standard care.

## Contribution

This pilot RCT evaluates a novel home-based activity reactivation program as an adjuvant to usual therapy for Medicare home health patients.

## Key findings

- The program showed high acceptability with 95% satisfaction and no serious adverse events.
- The control group improved more in motor skills post-intervention, though not at follow-up.
- No significant differences were found in secondary physical function outcomes between groups.

## Abstract

Reducing task demands early in rehabilitation and gradually increasing them may enhance functional outcomes for patients receiving home health therapy. This pilot randomized controlled trial, completed in March 2025, examined the feasibility and preliminary effects of the Home-based Activity Reactivation Program, which integrates compensatory and restorative strategies to calibrate task demands as an adjuvant treatment to usual therapy. Forty-seven patients (mean age 82) were randomized to receive the Home-based Activity Reactivation Program plus usual therapy (n = 24) or usual therapy alone (n = 23). The Home-based Activity Reactivation Program was delivered in six weekly home visits, separate from usual therapy sessions. The primary outcome was Motor Skills from the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills; secondary outcomes included multiple measures of physical function. The Home-based Activity Reactivation Program demonstrated high acceptability, with 95% of completers reporting satisfaction and no severe or serious adverse events. Unexpectedly, the control group showed greater improvement in Motor Skills at postintervention (estimated difference -0.29 logits, p = 0.02), though this was not sustained at one-month follow-up. No significant between-group differences were found over time for secondary outcomes. These findings suggest that the Home-based Activity Reactivation Program did not yield superior outcomes compared to usual therapy alone. Potential contributing factors include limited intervention intensity, scheduling challenges, and practitioner bias. The study highlights the complexities of integrating and evaluating adjuvant interventions within routine home health care and underscores the need for further refinement and testing of the Home-based Activity Reactivation Program to optimize its effectiveness.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12762155