# Use of and Factors Associated With the Use of Mobility Assistive Devices Among Older Adults in Low-Income Housing

## TL;DR

This study examines how older adults in low-income housing use mobility assistive devices and finds that concerns about falling and unsteadiness are linked to their use.

## Contribution

The study identifies self-reported concerns about falling and unsteadiness as significant predictors of MAD use in a specific population.

## Key findings

- Over half of the participants (53%) used a mobility assistive device.
- Worrying about falling and feeling unsteady were strongly associated with MAD use.
- Poorer self-reported health status was linked to lower likelihood of MAD use.

## Abstract

There is a growing number of older adults in low-income housing communities that live with disabilities. Many of these individuals use mobility assistive devices (MADs) including walkers, canes, or wheelchairs, which they obtain from others, purchase or are ordered by a health care provider. This study explored the use of MADs among residents in low-income housing and factors associated with MAD use. It was hypothesized that the majority of individuals would use a MAD; and that perceived health status, cognition, exercise, unsteadiness, fear of falling, a fall in the past year, and fall-related injury, dizziness, and musculoskeletal or neurological disease would be associated with use of an MAD. Data were obtained from older adults (N = 220) who participated in an Annual Wellness Visit as part of an interdisciplinary wellness clinic. The mean age of participants was 79.5 (SD = 8.5), the majority was female (77%), Black (69%) and non-Hispanic (80%). Over half (53%) used a MAD. Worrying about falling (Wald=5.4, p =.02), feeling unsteady (Wald=19.7, p<.001), and health status (Wald 4.3, p=.04) were all significantly associated with MAD use. Those who worried were 2.9 times more likely to use a MAD, those who felt unsteady were 5.8 times more likely to use an MAD, and those who reported worse health status were 0.44 times less likely to use a MAD. Individuals seem to self-select use of a MAD based on concerns around falls. Future research should focus on the appropriateness of these devices at the individual level for safety and cost effectiveness.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12761755