Bridging HRSA Priority Gaps in Geriatrics Education: Insights from Geriatric Fast Facts Usage Data
Edmund Duthie, Angela Beckert, Kathryn Denson, Amanda Szymkowski, Deborah Simpson, Steven Denson

TL;DR
This paper analyzes usage data from a geriatrics education website to identify gaps between expert-defined priorities and user interests.
Contribution
The study provides insights into how user engagement with geriatrics education content aligns with HRSA priorities.
Findings
42% of Geriatric Fast Facts were mapped to 7 of 11 HRSA priority topics.
Elder Justice had the highest engagement, while Health Inequities had the lowest.
Four HRSA priorities were not represented in the website content.
Abstract
The Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) has identified 11 priority topics for interprofessional training and education to address the primary care needs of older adults. Healthcare professionals and learners increasingly rely on online resources for focused education. The Geriatric Fast Facts (GFFs) website is a globally accessed mobile enabled website for geriatrics education. Analyzing user engagement data from this site can identify gaps between expert-defined priorities and user-identified needs, informing targeted educational dissemination efforts. 107 GFFs were mapped to the 11 HRSA age/dementia-friendly priority topics. Google Analytics usage data from 2/25/2024 – 2/24/2025 was analyzed to assess GFF user engagement, including usage per topic and alignment with HRSA priorities. 42% (45/107) of GFFs were associated with 7 HRSA priorities. Of the top 25 viewed GFFs, 8…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Use by Older Adults · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Aging and Gerontology Research
