Street-Level Bureaucracy and Documentation: Addressing Conflicting Rights in Nursing Homes through Care Plans
Angela Perone

TL;DR
This study explores how nursing home staff use care plans to navigate conflicting rights, showing how documentation becomes a tool for problem-solving across different staff levels.
Contribution
The study reveals how care plans are used as problem-solving tools by different nursing home staff levels to address conflicting rights.
Findings
Front-line workers use care plans as deferential problem-solving tools.
Mid-level managers use care plans to shape clinical decisions collaboratively.
Upper-level managers use care plans as a liability protection tool.
Abstract
Conflicting rights are exceedingly common in nursing homes, one of the most heavily regulated industry in the United States (e.g., safety, autonomy, privacy). Staff have increasingly incorporated documentation in resident care. This study investigates how do staff use documentation to address conflicting rights in nursing homes? It employs a qualitative comparative case study with 80 in-depth interviews of staff and ethnographic observation of interactions among staff, residents, and visitors for eight months at two nursing homes. Staff referenced “care plans” as the primary tool to address conflicting rights. Front-line workers (e.g., CNAs, floor nurses) used care plans as deferential problem-solving tools and deferred to “looking in the care plan” to identify what they should do. Mid-level managers used care plans as dynamic clinical problem-solving tools for residents by identifying…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Elder Abuse and Neglect · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
