Age-related Differences in Moral Decision-making: Utilitarian vs. Deontological judgments
Isu Cho, Angela Gutchess

TL;DR
Older adults make fewer utilitarian moral judgments than younger adults, possibly due to declines in working memory.
Contribution
The study distinguishes between utilitarian and deontological judgments using process dissociation, revealing age differences in utilitarian reasoning.
Findings
Older adults made fewer utilitarian judgments compared to younger adults.
Age differences in utilitarian judgments were mediated by working memory capacity.
There was no age difference in deontological judgments.
Abstract
Research has suggested that older people are more likely to make deontological (i.e., focusing on rules and duties), rather than utilitarian (i.e., focusing on the consequences to maximize welfare the most people), moral judgments compared to younger adults. Although deontological and utilitarian judgments are in independent relationships, previous studies on age differences in moral decision-making have treated them as endpoints (i.e., higher on one automatically means lower on the other). Therefore, it is uncertain whether the age-related differences come from deontological judgments, utilitarian judgments, or both. The current study compared 65 younger (aged 18 to 22) and 63 older (aged 60 and above) adults’ judgments in a moral dilemma. Using a traditional moral dilemma analysis in which deontological and utilitarian judgments are considered as reciprocal, results corresponded with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Ethics in Business and Education · Aging and Gerontology Research
