Advance Directive Preferences: Comparing Medical-Social-Emotional vs. Medical-Based Approaches
Ashley Shayya, Yuchi Young, Yufang Tu, Wan-Yu Chiu, Taylor Perre

TL;DR
This study compares preferences for two types of advance directives and finds that younger adults prefer a more holistic, emotional approach over a purely medical one.
Contribution
The study identifies age-related preferences and specific recommendations for improving advance directive forms.
Findings
Young adults prefer the Five Wishes form over POLST/MOLST.
Participants suggested adding more medical treatment questions to the Five Wishes form.
POLST/MOLST needs clearer language and a more holistic approach according to users.
Abstract
This study explores adults’ preferences for and recommendations to improve medical-based (POLST/MOLST) and medical-social-emotional-based (Five Wishes) advance directives, with a focus on age-related differences. US community-dwelling adults completed a survey on advance directives. Univariate analyses were used to assess advance directive type preferences, bivariate analyses evaluated age differences, and a thematic analysis identified recommendations for improvement. Participants, particularly young adults, preferred the Five Wishes form over the POLST/MOLST. Three key themes emerged from participants’ recommendations for improving the advance directives: content, formatting, and no recommendations. A greater proportion of participants shared content recommendations for the POLST/MOLST and formatting recommendations or no recommendations for the Five Wishes form. For the POLST/MOLST,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Ethics in medical practice · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
