Characterizing Occupational Complexity: Insights from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
Catherine Gosselin, Annick Parent-Lamarche, Benjamin Boller

TL;DR
This study identifies two main types of occupational complexity among older Canadian workers, which could influence cognitive health after retirement.
Contribution
The study introduces a data-driven classification of occupational complexity into two distinct dimensions using the CLSA cohort.
Findings
Two dimensions of occupational complexity were identified: 'Coordination and Support' and 'Autonomous Management'.
These dimensions explain 82.5% of the variance in occupational complexity within the CLSA cohort.
Abstract
Using data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), we found that previous research suggests cognitive trajectories following retirement exhibit heterogeneity (Gosselin & Boller, 2022). One potential explanatory factor is the complexity of one’s profession, which has been linked to cognitive reserve theory. However, the specific structure of occupational complexity within this cohort remains to be fully characterized. This study aims to identify and define the key dimensions of occupational complexity among participants from the CLSA using a data-driven approach. The sample consisted of 8,243 workers (M = 54.18, SD = 6.09). Occupational information was classified using the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) to derive complexity scores based on levels of interaction with data, people, and materials. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to extract…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOccupational Therapy Practice and Research · Retirement, Disability, and Employment · Career Development and Diversity
