# Exploring lifelong learning organization with Endogenous and Exogenous concept: A Case Study of Japan and Taiwan

## TL;DR

This paper compares lifelong learning models in Japan and Taiwan to understand how they adapt to societal changes and promote community interaction.

## Contribution

The study introduces the concepts of endogenous and exogenous lifelong learning models through a comparative case analysis of Japan and Taiwan.

## Key findings

- Kashiwa City's Tamago project emphasizes community-driven, collaborative learning.
- Huwei AALC follows a government-led, curriculum-based approach for older adults.
- Both models enhance social interaction but differ in organizational structure and motivation.

## Abstract

In response to the VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity) era, lifelong learning organizations must undergo transformative changes as societies emphasize mutual recognition and self-discovery through interaction. This study explores Taiwan’s transition by analyzing Japan’s multi-layered community-based lifelong learning organizations. The Tamago project in Kashiwa City fosters lifelong learning through community cafés and diverse activities, including educational programs, board game creation, festivals, and holiday events. The Huwei Active Aging Learning Center (AALC), established by Taiwan’s Ministry of Education, offers diverse courses focusing on intergenerational interaction, health promotion, and liberal arts. This study employs Bereday’s comparative method through interviews, on-site visits, and literature review to analyze the organizational structure, mission, curriculum design, and participant demographics of these two lifelong learning organizations. The analysis reveals distinct differences: Kashiwa operates as an autonomous, resident-managed organization, while Huwei AALC functions as a government-commissioned institution with certified instructors and local managers. Kashiwa emphasizes community problem-solving and collaborative teaching, facilitating intergenerational skill-sharing, whereas Huwei follows a curriculum-based approach targeting older adults over 55. Despite similarities in course content and formation, the two models reflect fundamentally different developmental approaches—endogenous (Kashiwa) versus exogenous (Huwei). Both successfully strengthen localized small-scale social interactions, fostering environments for social connection, self-actualization, and self-identity. Taiwan could benefit from Kashiwa’s intergenerational approach to enhance intrinsic motivation among older adults. Future implications include optimizing the learning environment to enhance civic literacy and redefining government roles to view older adults as valuable societal resources

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12760571