Intersectional Ageism: Prescriptive Stereotypes and Moral Judgments of Older Adults
Hannah Gans

TL;DR
This study explores how stereotypes and moral judgments about older adults vary based on their race and gender, showing that older White men face unique societal pressures.
Contribution
The paper introduces the concept of intersectional prescriptive stereotypes in ageism, revealing how race and gender shape societal expectations and moral judgments of older adults.
Findings
Older White men are most expected to step aside for younger generations.
Older White men are perceived as the greatest moral violators in society.
Prescriptive stereotypes and moral judgments vary significantly by intersectional identity.
Abstract
Research on ageism has primarily focused on descriptive stereotypes, while prescriptive expectations—societal beliefs about how older adults should behave—have received less attention, particularly in relation to intersecting identities. When older adults do not conform to these expectations, they may experience negative social consequences, and drawing from intersectionality research, these consequences are likely to vary among older adults with different intersecting identities. To examine these dynamics, we surveyed 355 young adults on societal pressures placed on older adults with intersecting identities. Using a modified Succession, Identity, and Consumption scale (North & Fiske, 2013), we varied the target’s race (Black, White) and gender (man, woman). In a separate analysis, participants also rated the perceived immorality of these targets in society. We found that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAging and Gerontology Research · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology
