Comparing Robotic and Real Cat Companionship in Mitigating Loneliness Among Elderly Populations
Bingwen Wang, Kaiting Ma

TL;DR
This study compares robotic and real cats in reducing loneliness among elderly people, finding both effective but with different benefits.
Contribution
The study introduces a robotic cat as a scalable, practical alternative to live cat therapy for elderly loneliness.
Findings
Both robotic and real cat groups showed significant reductions in loneliness and improved mental health.
Robotic cats were valued for constant availability and ease of care, while real cats provided emotional warmth.
The robotic cat offers a viable, scalable solution for reducing loneliness in elderly populations.
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a newly developed robotic cat compared to live cat therapy in reducing loneliness among elderly individuals. It aims to determine whether robotic feline companionship can provide similar emotional and mental health benefits to real cat interactions, offering a scalable solution for socially isolated older adults. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 180 elderly participants experiencing chronic loneliness. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: interaction with a robotic cat, interaction with a real therapy cat, or a control group receiving standard care. The study lasted six months, with outcomes measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, and physiological stress indicators (cortisol levels and heart rate variability). Semi-structured interviews explored participants’ subjective experiences…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
