Does Self-Rated Health Predict Both Avoidable and Unavoidable Causes of Mortality?
Ellen Idler, Emily Dore, Courtney Yarbrough

TL;DR
This study explores how self-rated health predicts mortality from causes that can be prevented or treated versus those that cannot.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel approach of categorizing mortality into treatable, preventable, and unavoidable causes to better understand SRH's predictive power.
Findings
Poor self-rated health is linked to higher mortality risks for treatable and preventable-plus-treatable causes.
Self-rated health does not predict mortality from preventable or unavoidable causes.
The study highlights the role of health knowledge in mortality prediction.
Abstract
Self-rated health (SRH) has been known as a predictor of all-cause mortality for decades. The mechanism by which poor SRH is so consistently associated with higher risks of mortality, however, is still unclear. One approach taken to better understand this effect has been to disaggregate mortality by cause of death. This has yielded mixed results, given the sacrifice of sample size for single causes of death, but a benefit has been suggestions that respondents with some knowledge of their risks for, or diagnoses of, such single causes, show enhanced effects of SRH. We introduce the approach of disaggregating all-cause mortality into meaningful groups of causes. Originating in health policy studies, the concepts of preventable and treatable causes of mortality have been used to assess the effectiveness of public health and medical care systems, often by comparing countries. Does SRH have…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth disparities and outcomes · Employment and Welfare Studies · Global Health Care Issues
