A Simulation Approach to Evaluate Pre-Enrollment Survival Bias in Cross-National Aging Epidemiology Research

TL;DR

This paper uses simulations to show how survival bias before enrollment can distort estimates of type 2 diabetes duration's effect on dementia in aging studies.

Contribution

The study introduces a simulation framework to quantify pre-enrollment survival bias in cross-national aging research.

Findings

The effect of type 2 diabetes duration on dementia could be underestimated by up to 4.5 times the standard error.

Age-standardized estimates in the US and England showed minimal differences despite survival bias.

Simulation results suggest survival bias may explain inconsistent effect estimates across countries.

Abstract

Selection bias caused by collider stratification can distort the estimated effects of exposures on outcomes. As a specific type of selection bias, pre-enrollment survival bias is especially salient in aging research because differential mortality in older populations can yield study samples that systematically deviate from their target populations. Several cross-national comparison studies have observed heterogeneity in the estimated effect of risk factors on aging outcomes, which could be due to true effect heterogeneity or spurious differences due to bias. For example, inconsistent estimates across countries could arise from various magnitudes of pre-enrollment survival bias induced by varying life expectancies across countries. To evaluate how pre-enrollment survival bias can account for the discrepancy in effect estimation in multiple countries, we used cross-national simulations to quantify potential bias in the estimated effect of type 2 diabetes duration on dementia. We simulated country-specific cohorts of individuals born between 1927 and 1951 in the US, England, and India (N = 250,000 each). Under three causal structures for each country that represented the relations among type 2 diabetes duration, vital status in 2016, and dementia status in 2016, we compared the estimated effect among survivors with the true causal effect. We found that the effect of type 2 diabetes duration on dementia could be underestimated as much as 4.5 times the estimated standard error. Age standardization was also applied to enable comparisons of estimated effects across countries. The age-standardized estimates in the US and England did not differ substantially.