# Framing Equity and Social Justice in a New Era for Aging Centers

**Authors:** Angela Perone

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaf122.613 · Innovation in Aging · 2025-12-31

## TL;DR

This paper discusses how aging centers like CASAS address equity and social justice amid a changing social and political landscape.

## Contribution

The paper presents CASAS as a case study for reconciling contradictions between DEI initiatives and professional social work standards.

## Key findings

- CASAS uses auto-ethnographic data to explore diverse approaches to equity in aging services.
- The study reveals tensions between DEI efforts and professional ethical standards in social work.
- Findings offer insights for aging centers navigating social and political uncertainties.

## Abstract

As our population ages and becomes more diverse, the work of aging centers is needed now more than ever before. Founded in 1996 through generous support from the Eugene and Rose Kleiner Family Foundation, the Center for the Advanced Study of Aging Services (CASAS) conducts research, educates emerging and established leaders, and informs policies to improve the lives of older adults and their care partners. As part of the School of Social Welfare at the University of California, Berkeley, CASAS is rooted in equity and social justice values. Social justice is explicitly named as a core value and ethical principle in the code of conduct for social workers through the National Association of Social Workers (NASW). Many of the contested research, education, and language stemming from prohibited work around DEI contrasts directly with professional standards for social work researchers, educators, and practitioners. This presentation will illuminate evolving challenges and strategies employed by CASAS as a case study to reconcile these inherent contradictions. Organizational auto-ethnographic data from this case study illustrates the diversity of academic, professional, and policy frames and approaches to equity and social justice in a turbulent social and political moment of uncertainty. It also provides insights for other aging centers, researchers, and practitioners navigating these professional and ethical tensions.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12760089