The Long Arc of Self-Rated Health Research
Ellen Idler, Ted Johnson

TL;DR
This paper reviews decades of research on self-rated health in older adults and its strong link to mortality.
Contribution
It highlights recent advancements in understanding SRH's predictive power and its implications for health outcomes.
Findings
Self-rated health (SRH) is a reliable predictor of mortality across diverse populations.
Research has explored how sociodemographic factors and health optimism influence SRH.
Recent studies compare SRH with algorithm-derived diagnoses and examine its relationship with dual functionality.
Abstract
Research with older populations that asks respondents to assess their health with a single question began with the Duke Longitudinal Studies of Normal Aging in the 1950s. Early patterns that emerged were that physicians tended to rate overall health more negatively than study subjects, and that respondent “optimism” about health increased with age. In the 1980s a series of population-based studies of older respondents found that “poor” SRH was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality, even when physical health and other important covariates were well-characterized. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s literally hundreds of studies of representative, population-based samples in countries around the world have shown nearly universally that SRH is a reliable predictor of mortality, despite many forms of the question and different response categories. Since then, researchers have focused on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimism, Hope, and Well-being · Aging and Gerontology Research · Health disparities and outcomes
