Geroscience Meets Medical and Social Science: Explaining Differential Aging Health
Eileen Crimmins

TL;DR
This paper explores how social factors influence aging rates by linking them to biological processes through geroscience and medical science.
Contribution
It integrates molecular, cellular, and clinical biological measures into models of social differences in aging health outcomes.
Findings
Social conditions affect aging rates via biological processes.
Combining Hallmarks of Aging with clinical risk factors improves understanding of differential aging.
Integrated models can clarify how the social world impacts health deterioration.
Abstract
Geroscience has hypothesized that all age-related health outcomes are related to a set of age-related biological processes that combine to produce health deterioration with age. Medical science has been developing an increasingly wider array of risk factors for age-related health outcomes. Social science has long focused on differential aging; i.e. aging that occurs at different rates for population subgroups, those exposed to adverse social conditions, or health behaviors that put them at risk. Using insights from geroscience and medical science, I will provide greater clarity to how the social world gets under the skin to produce differential rates of aging through the mediation of biological processes. This will be done through the integration of biological measures at two levels – the molecular and cellular features included in the “Hallmarks of Aging” and risk factors identified at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Health disparities and outcomes
