Lessons Learned in Sampling Community-Dwelling Black/African American Older Adults Without Advocates

TL;DR

This paper shares challenges faced when recruiting Black/African American older adults without family support for research and suggests ways to improve future recruitment efforts.

Contribution

The paper provides practical insights and recommendations for sampling a hard-to-reach population of Black/African American older adults without advocates.

Findings

Snowball sampling had limited success in recruiting community-dwelling Black/African American OAWA.

Recruitment barriers included language differences, gatekeeper reluctance, and lack of a validated screening tool.

Future research should involve trusted gatekeepers and use larger seed groups for better engagement.

Abstract

“Older Adults Without Advocates” (OAWA), a clinical population referred to as “elder orphans” by the American Geriatrics Society, are conceptualized as older adults lacking kin support. While multidisciplinary literatures highlight the urgent need for more research on this growing, higher-need population, identifying OAWA in community and clinical settings remains a challenge, posing barriers to research recruitment. We report lessons learned from sampling community-dwelling Black/African American (B/AA) OAWA for a qualitative study and suggest avenues for future successes in sampling this population. Using best practices for sampling hidden populations and B/AA older adults, we utilized snowball sampling of community-dwelling B/AA OAWA with limited success. Despite strong community support for the study and recruitment, including four initial sampling “seeds,” engagement with >50 referrers across New York City to identify >60 potential OAWA, and successfully extending referral chains up to five degrees, we were only able to interview three eligible OAWA. We encountered multiple recruitment barriers, including: discrepancies between referrers’ and OAWA candidates’ perceptions of familial support; discordance between stricter clinical and looser social definitions of OAWA; gatekeepers’ reluctance or inaccessibility for referrals; inability to reach OAWA candidates using provided contact information; eligible candidates’ reluctance to participate; language barriers (Spanish and Haitian Creole); and lack of a validated OAWA screening tool. Future research should consider engaging trusted gatekeepers as interviewers, using a larger “seed” group and including OAWA residing in long-term care facilities. A validated screening tool tailored to diverse communities is essential for improving recruitment and success of research on community-dwelling OAWA.