Responding to Elder Abuse When Victims Oppose Legal Intervention: Insights from the Front Lines
Catheryn Koss

TL;DR
This study explores how professionals handle elder abuse cases when victims refuse legal action, emphasizing the need for victim-centered approaches and support.
Contribution
The paper introduces new insights into the challenges of balancing legal action with victim autonomy in elder abuse cases.
Findings
Professionals face challenges with the legal system's timing when working with elder abuse victims.
Trusted advocates and consistent support are crucial for building trust with victims.
There is disagreement on how much influence victims should have in legal decisions.
Abstract
Elder abuse cases present unique challenges when victims are reluctant to prosecute their abusers or take other legal action, often due to familial ties. This qualitative study examines insights from over 20 professionals, including prosecutors, Adult Protective Services (APS) workers, and private attorneys, who work directly with elder abuse victims. Several key themes were identified across the in-depth interviews that highlight the complexities of balancing legal imperatives with victim-centered approaches. One theme is asynchronous time, where the legal system moves too quickly when victims need more time and too slowly when urgent action is required. Another is the importance of an ally, emphasizing the need for a trusted advocate to support victims. Participants also stressed active and open listening, which helps victims share their stories, reduce shame, and provide prosecutors…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElder Abuse and Neglect · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
