# Virtual Team-Based Mentorship: Fostering Knowledge Acquisition, Career Advancement, and Connectedness

## TL;DR

A virtual mentorship program for clinical faculty improved career growth, knowledge, and networking, showing that structured virtual mentorship can be effective.

## Contribution

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of structured virtual mentorship in supporting clinical faculty's career advancement and satisfaction.

## Key findings

- Participants highly valued virtual mentorship for career advancement and academic promotion.
- Virtual mentorship was found to be effective and had an appropriate time commitment for most participants.
- Post-engagement data showed strong positive outcomes, including improved job satisfaction and networking.

## Abstract

Mentoring for clinical faculty in academic health centers offers numerous benefits; however, structured virtual mentoring remains understudied in this context. The Mentorship Matters pilot program was established to better understand whether providing structured curricula in a virtual format can result in positive outcomes for clinical faculty.

Mentorship Matters offered tailored, virtual mentoring for Department of Medicine faculty, covering topics such as career advancement, academic promotion, and work-life integration, through monthly virtual meetings. Participants underwent pre-, mid-, and post-engagement surveys, including the Leadership in Academic Medicine Program Survey and internal questions tailored by the Mentorship Matters team after reviewing mentorship literature for clinical faculty

21,24.

Among 23 mentees and 8 mentors, pre-engagement data showed 25% of mentees reported no previous mentoring

23
. Sixty-three percent felt inadequately supported and expressed a need for career guidance

23
. Fifty-seven percent of mentors lacked formal mentoring and 86% felt under-supported

23
. Results from the mid-point survey demonstrated that mentees (n=10) highly valued Mentorship Matters for career advancement (100%), academic promotion (89%), work-life integration (78%), and scholarship support (78%); 90% found the time commitment appropriate

23,24. Among mentors (n=8), 88% found the time commitment suitable, all found the virtual format effective, and 63% found content on difficult conversations meaningful. In the post-engagement survey, both mentees (n=9) and mentors (n=7) found topics such as leadership development, career advancement, academic promotion, and work-life integration to be highly meaningful

23,24. Mentees emphasized the value of networking. Post-engagement data suggested a strong positive correlation between the virtual format and appropriate time commitment for mentees (
r(7) = 1,
P < 0.001)

23,24.

Virtual, regularly scheduled programmatic mentorship supports clinical faculty's career growth. Programs like Mentorship Matters enhance knowledge, job satisfaction, and networking, which fosters faculty success in academic health centers.