# Land security and crop theft in rural Tanzania

## TL;DR

Farmers in Tanzania with individually-owned land are more likely to face crop theft, but land titling reduces this risk.

## Contribution

This study empirically links land tenure modes and titling to agricultural crime victimization in rural Tanzania.

## Key findings

- Farmers with individually-owned plots face higher crop theft and vandalism risks than those with family-owned plots.
- Land titling is associated with a reduced likelihood of agricultural crime victimization.
- Results are robust across multiple statistical methods including logistic regression and propensity score matching.

## Abstract

Is the risk of agricultural crime victimization linked to land titling and different land tenure modes? Drawing on a unique household survey from rural Tanzania, we find that farmers cultivating individually-owned plots are more likely to experience victimization, such as theft and vandalism of staple crops, compared to those operating on family-owned plots. Moreover, land titling has a negative effect on crime victimization. Our results remain robust under several empirical strategies, namely double lasso logistic regression and a linear probability model, as well as propensity score matching and an inverse probability-weighted regression. The findings offer policy relevant insights for enhancing land security and reducing agricultural crime in rural settings.