Targeting the microbiome in pediatric migraine: gastrointestinal manifestations and the therapeutic role of Bifidobacterium longum
Pi-Chuan Fan, Huey-Huey Chua, Chia-Ray Lin, Tzu-Hsuan Lai, Lih-Chu Chiou, Wang-Tso Lee, Huey-Ling Chen, Yen-Hsuan Ni
TL;DR
This study explores gut microbiome differences in children with migraine and finds that Bifidobacterium longum may help reduce migraine symptoms.
Contribution
The study identifies Bifidobacterium longum as a potential therapeutic for pediatric migraine through gut-brain axis modulation.
Findings
Migraine patients had reduced Bifidobacterium longum and elevated Bacteroides compared to controls.
B. longum supplementation reduced headache days, intensity, and frequency in a pilot study.
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii was linked to milder migraine symptoms in patients without GI disorders.
Abstract
Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder that often begins in childhood or adolescence and is frequently accompanied by gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. However, the microbiota signatures and gut–brain interactions underlying pediatric migraine, particularly in the presence of GI disorder, remain poorly defined. This study aimed to explore the clinical and microbial features of pediatric migraine, as well as the therapeutic potential of probiotics. We prospectively enrolled 126 pediatric migraine patients (ages 6–19) with or without GI disorder and 50 age-matched healthy controls. Fecal microbiota was profiled using 16S rRNA sequencing. Patients with migraine were stratified based on Rome IV-defined GI disorders and evaluated for headache characteristics, PedMIDAS scores (disability assessment), plasma calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP, thought as a key biomarker of migraine),…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7| All | Total migraineurs ( | Migraine with GI disorder ( | Migraine without GI disorder ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 61/65 | 25/34 | 36/31 | 0.203 |
|
| 143 ± 3.4 | 145 ± 4.8 | 141 ± 4.8 | 0.562 |
|
| 112 ± 3.7 | 110 ± 5.3 | 114 ± 5.2 | 0.622 |
|
| 30.9 ± 2.6 | 34.6 ± 4.6 | 27.7 ± 2.9 | 0.208 |
|
| 28.8 ± 2.6 | 28.6 ± 3.6 | 28.9 ± 3.8 | 0.95 |
|
| 5.87 ± 0.16 | 6.14 ± 0.23 | 5.64 ± 0.23 | 0.124 |
|
| 43 ± 7.3 | 60 ± 13.2 | 29 ± 7.0 | 0.042 |
|
| 80 (65) | 37 (65) | 43 (64) | 0.932 |
|
| ||||
|
| 64:32:27 | 27:19:11 | 37:13:16 | 0.226 |
|
| 45 (36) | 25 (44) | 20 (30) | 0.134 |
|
| ||||
|
| 52 (44) | 20 (36) | 32 (51) | 0.115 |
|
| 74 (63) | 36 (67) | 38 (60) | 0.478 |
|
| 40 (34) | 14 (24) | 26 (41) | 0.07 |
|
| 49 (41) | 25 (46) | 24 (38) | 0.379 |
|
| 17 (16) | 10 (19) | 7 (13) | 0.360 |
|
| 58 (48) | 29 (53) | 29 (45) | 0.376 |
|
| 89 (72) | 43 (75) | 46 (69) | 0.675 |
|
| 67 (58) | 31 (57) | 36 (59) | 0.861 |
|
| 35 (30) | 27 (50) | 8 (13) | <0.001 |
|
| 39 (34) | 20 (37) | 19 (31) | 0.506 |
|
| 61 (53) | 32 (59) | 29 (48) | 0.209 |
|
| 26 (23) | 11 (20) | 15 (25) | 0.589 |
|
| 18 (16) | 12 (22) | 6 (10) | 0.068 |
|
| 26 (23) | 10 (19) | 16 (26) | 0.324 |
|
| 34 (30) | 15 (28) | 19 (31) | 0.693 |
|
| 71 (62) | 32 (59) | 39 (64) | 0.607 |
|
| 29 (25) | 15 (28) | 14 (23) | 0.552 |
|
| 90 (73) | 42 (74) | 48 (72) | 0.938 |
|
| 20 (17) | 10 (18) | 10 (16) | 0.803 |
|
| 74 (61) | 32 (57) | 42 (64) | 0.464 |
|
| 82 (66) | 35 (61) | 47 (70) | 0.305 |
|
| 82 (66) | 41 (72) | 41 (61) | 0.208 |
|
| 25:41:16 | 13:21:7 | 12:20:9 | 0.855 |
- —National Science and Technology Council10.13039/501100020950
- —National Taiwan University Hospital10.13039/501100005762
- —E-da Hospital-National Taiwan University Hospital Joint Research Program, Taiwan
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMigraine and Headache Studies · Gut microbiota and health · Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Introduction
Migraine is a complex neurologic disorder characterized by recurrent, often disabling headaches accompanied by heightened sensitivity to light, sound, and motion.1 It remains among the most prevalent causes of disability worldwide.2 Current models suggest that migraine arises through a cascade involving peripheral trigeminovascular activation including trigeminal ganglia (TG), neurogenic inflammation, and subsequent sensitization of central pain pathways such as trigeminocervical complex (TCC). Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a key neuropeptide in this process, contributes to vasodilation and inflammatory signaling.3^,^4 Elevated CGRP levels have been documented in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of migraine patients,5-7 particularly during acute attacks.8^,^9
A growing body of evidence indicates a strong association between migraine and gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, including functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and abdominal migraine,10 and even early-life conditions such as infant colic.11 These overlaps suggest shared pathophysiological mechanisms centered on visceral hypersensitivity and neuroimmune interactions, with contributors such as serotonin, CGRP, and inflammatory cytokines.12 The gut microbiota has emerged as a key player in brain–gut communication, influencing immune function, intestinal permeability, and neuroactive metabolite production.13 Increased intestinal permeability and inflammatory responses, probably mediated by proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, undigested food particles, and bacterial metabolites or endotoxins might act on the trigeminovascular system to trigger migraine-like attacks.14-16 Microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids, serotonin, and dopamine can further signal through the enteric and central nervous systems, thereby modulating brain function.17^,^18 Early-life microbiota development also shapes long-term immune and neurologic outcomes.19 Despite these connections,10 the role of the gut microbiome in pediatric migraine, particularly in relation to GI disorders, remains poorly understood and has not been systematically characterized.
Preclinical migraine models, including nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced hyperalgesia, cortical spreading depression (CSD), and capsaicin-induced trigeminovascular activation, reproduce core features of the disorder such as CGRP release, neuronal sensitization, and migraine-like pain behaviors. Their responsiveness to established antimigraine therapies, supports their translational relevance.20-22 These models have recently been extended to investigate the gut–brain axis, where manipulation of the gut microbiota through antibiotics, probiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation has been shown to modulate migraine-like phenotypes.23^,^24 Microbiome and metabolome profiling in NTG and related models further reveals taxa- and metabolite-level alterations such as short-chain fatty acids and tryptophan pathways. These changes mirror patient findings and underscore the models’ utility for studying links between gut dysbiosis and migraine pathophysiology.25
We hypothesized that gut dysbiosis contributes to migraine pathogenesis, and microbiome modulation may restore the deleterious effects. To test this, we conducted a prospective study combining clinical and microbial analyzes, along with an exploratory pilot study.
Methods
Study subjects
We prospectively recruited 126 patients aged 6-19 years who visited the pediatric neurology clinic or wards and diagnosed with migraine between July 2019 and October 2023 at National Taiwan University Hospital, a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. The diagnosis of migraine was made according to the criteria by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache, 2013.11 All enrolled subjects received thorough clinical evaluation and documentation, which included age, sex, age of onset, headache features with intensity scale of 0-10, duration, frequency, triggers, and family history of migraine. Migraine disability was evaluated with the Pediatric MIgraine Disability ASsessment (PedMIDAS).26 Fifty age-matched healthy controls were recruited with no history of headache or chronic medical, neurological, or psychiatric conditions. Both patients and controls were excluded if they had received antibiotic treatment within the previous two weeks, probiotic treatment within the past month, or if they had multiple congenital anomalies or intellectual disability (Figure 1).
Workflow of the present study. N, number of patients recruited; n, number of stool or blood samples.
To distinguish migraine patients with or without GI disorders, we recorded GI symptoms in all patients. Migraine patients with GI disorders were defined by a clinical diagnosis of migraine, according to the criteria by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache in 2013,11 plus a positive GI diagnosis including functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, or abdominal migraine, according to Rome IV diagnostic criteria.27 This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Taiwan University Hospital (201812147RIN), with informed consents obtained.
Sample collection
Of the 126 patients with migraine, blood (n = 107) and fecal material (n = 119) were collected after enrollment. For microbiome analysis, fecal samples were collected from 50 age-matched pediatric healthy controls. Of the 126 enrolled patients with migraine, 31 of the subjects have had paired stool and blood samples collected, clearly linked with symptoms: between attacks and during headache attacks, with a symptom-free period of at least one week.
Stool microbiome analysis
16S rRNA gene amplification and library construction
DNA was isolated from fecal samples of the migraine patients using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The V3-V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified by PCR; and the libraries for 16S V3-V4 amplicons were prepared following the Illumina library construction protocol.
MiSeq-based high-throughput sequencing and data analysis
Libraries were sequenced using the paired-end 2 × 300 bp Illumina MiSeq platform. Raw FASTQ files were denoised using DADA2 within the QIIME 2 plugin.28^,^29 The taxonomies of denoised amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were classified based on the EZBiocloud database.30 The beta diversity results were plotted with the QIIME2 plugin core-metrics-phylogenetic, and LEfSe was analyzed by using MicrobiomeAnalyst web tools.31
Measurement of plasma CGRP and cytokine levels
Plasma samples from enrolled patients were stored at –80 °C and further used to measure CGRP, interleukin (IL) 1b, TNFα, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), IL6, and NFkB levels using ELIZA kits (CGRP: Bertin bioreagent, France; IL1-b/IL6/PGE2: Abcam, UK; TNF-α: Invitrogen, U.S.A.; NFkB: Elabscience, U.S.A.). Fecal samples were also measured by ELIZA (Bühlmann, Switzerland) for calprotectin. The individual who conducted the measurement was blinded to the identity, attack status and treatment of the study subjects.
Intra-cisternal capsaicin induced migraine-mimic rat model
All animal care and experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the College of Medicine of National Taiwan University. Male Wistar rats aged 7-8 weeks (226−275 g) and 3-4 weeks (76−125 g) were used. Female rats were excluded as sex hormones are significant confounding factors to migraine. Group allocation was concealed from all personnel except the allocator. Blinding was maintained during the experiment, outcome assessment, and data analysis to minimize bias. Adjusted Formula (for repeated measures design), 3 measurements per animal, and an intra-animal correlation of 0.5, the required sample size is approximately 5 animals per group to estimate a sample size for an independent groups design (e.g., treatment vs. control) for our animal study. Rats were housed in a temperature-controlled facility on a 12-h light/dark cycle, with free access to standard chow (LabDiet 5010), water, and a wooden stick for gnawing. Three animals were housed per cage (47.5 × 25.8 × 21.2 cm), and cages were cleaned according to standardized procedures.
Rats were pretreated with the probiotic, B. longum (3 × 10^9^ colony-forming units (Tadas^TM^, Suntory, Japan), or a multispecies probiotic product containing Bifidobacterium bifidum (10^9^ CFU) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (10^9^ CFU) (abbreviated as BbLa, Infloran^TM^, Laboratorio Farmaceutico, Italy) as a *B. longum-*negative probiotics control by oral gauge intragastric intubation for two weeks. Half doses of probiotics were adjusted for the young group. In the treatment-naïve group, the rat was pretreated daily with water by oral gavage for two weeks. Trigeminovascular activation in rats was induced by capsaicin via intracisternal instillation, following established protocols.22^,^32^,^33 Rats were anesthetized with urethane (1.5 g/kg, i.p.) and catheterized (PE-10, SIMS Portex Ltd, Hythe, UK), with capsaicin (10 nmol, 100 μl) administered into the cisterna magna over 1 min. Distribution was facilitated by positioning the rat at –30 degrees for 30 minutes, followed by 90 minutes in a prone position. Sham rats received vehicle only. Two-hour post-instillation, rats were euthanized and perfused with paraformaldehyde (4%) via the ascending aorta for immunostaining. Outcome measures included c-Fos immunoreactive (ir) neurons in TCC, and CGRP-ir neurons in TG, all clearly defined and standardized for consistency.
Immunohistochemical analysis of c-Fos protein in TCC tissue sections
TCC sections preparation and c-Fos-specific immunohistochemistry were accomplished following established methods.22^,^32^,^33 Brainstem with attached cervical cord was dissected into serial sections (50 μm) using a cryostat (LEICA CM3050S, Nussloch, Germany) from 1 mm rostral to the obex and continued to the C6 segment of the spinal cord. Sections at + 0.6, –1.2, and –9 mm from the obex were immunostained with antibody against c-Fos. The total number of c-Fos immunoreactive TCC neurons was estimated using a previously derived formula: 16(N1 + N2)/2 + 53(N2 + N3)/2, where N1, N2, and N3 were c-Fos-ir neuronal numbers at + 0.6, –1.2, and –9 mm from the obex, respectively.22
Free-floating immunohistochemistry for c-Fos protein was performed using the avidin-biotin method following the established protocols.22 Detection was performed using a rabbit polyclonal anti-c-Fos antibody (1:500 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, RRID: AB_306177), biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, RRID: AB_2313606), and horseradish peroxidase avidin D (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, RRID: AB_2336507). Immunoreactive signals were visualized with the DAB Reagent kit (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.), and c-Fos-ir neurons were counted using a microscope (Olympus BX51, Essex, UK). Data analysis was conducted by an investigator blinded to the treatment groups.
Immunofluorescence of CGRP in TG slice sections
TG sections preparation and CGRP immunofluorescence quantification followed established methods.22^,^32^,^33 Two TG tissues were dissected per rat and sectioned at a thickness of 50 μm using a microtome (LEICA RM2245, Nussloch, Germany). Nine sections were sampled from each ganglion, with every third section used for CGRP immunofluorescence. The sections were incubated with a rabbit primary antibody against CGRP (1:200; EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, U.S.A.) and then with a fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:50; Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, U.S.A.). Images were captured using an inverted light microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer. D1; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), and the intensity of CGRP expression was analyzed at 100X magnification using ImageJ software. The analysis was based on the optical density multiplied by the activated areas in each image.
Drugs
Capsaicin purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) was dissolved in a vehicle containing 10% ethanol and 10% Tween 80, sonicated for 5 min, and then further diluted (1:100) in an artificial CSF (aCSF) to create a stock solution which was stored at 4 °C. The aCSF comprised the following components (in mm): 117 NaCl, 4.5 KCl, 2.5 CaCl_2_, 1.2 MgCl_2_, 1.2 NaH_2_PO_4_, 25 NaHCO_3_, and 11.4 dextrose bubbled with 95% O_2_/5% CO_2_, pH 7.4.
16S rRNA microbiome analysis in mouse stools
Fecal samples were collected into sterilized 1.7 mL copolymer microtubes before anesthesia for surgical procedures and stored at −80 °C within 4 hours of collection. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QIAGEN). DNA concentration was quantified with a Qubit fluorometer, and libraries were prepared for 16S rRNA V3–V4 sequencing using the same protocol as described for migraine patient samples.
An exploratory pilot study to assess the clinical benefit of B. longum
The effect of B. longum was evaluated in an exploratory randomized double-blind pilot study assessing the feasibility of using probiotics in migraine patients who met the ICHD-3 criteria,11 between January 2023 and February 2025. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital (202207086RIND) (NCT07092241). Signed informed consent was obtained from each patient and the parents of the pediatric patients. Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to take B. longum (Tadas®, Suntory) or a formulation containing B. bifidum and L. acidophilus (Infloran®, Laboratorio Famaceuticr), the latter as a control group, using a computer-generated sequence. Allocation was concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes. Participants received daily intake of one of two probiotic products for 12 weeks: The probiotics in the latter formulation (B. bifidum and L. acidophilus) were not associated with migraine benefit in either previous or current studies. Throughout the study period, patients maintained a daily headache diary documenting pain score (0–10 scale), headache frequency, and number of headache days per week.
Statistical analysis
Data assumptions were assessed using normality tests (e.g., Shapiro-Wilk, or Kolmogorov-Smirnov) for continuous variables and homogeneity of variance (e.g., Levene’s test). If assumptions were violated, non-parametric tests (e.g., Mann-Whitney U test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test) were applied as appropriate. Data are expressed as the means ± SEs unless otherwise specified. All categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test. Results with a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) was used to identify specific microbes that best discriminated the groups. LDA score > 4 was defined as significant abundance. A linear mixed-effects model was fitted using the lme4 package (version 1.1−37) in R to estimate least squares means (LS means). The LS means were estimated using the emmeans package (version 1.11.1).
Results
Distinctive microbiota features involved in migraine pathogenesis
Study population
To explore the impact of gut microbiota on the pathogenesis of migraine, we enrolled 126 patients with migraine and 50 age-matched healthy controls in this study (Figure 1). Migraine patients were classified into subgroups based on the presence (n = 59) or absence (n = 67) of GI disorder according to their clinical manifestation (Figure 1). Patients were followed up for at least 6 months, and fecal samples were collected during both the attack (A) and non-attack (NA) phases throughout the study period (Figure 1).
Identification of migraine-associated taxa
In the microbiota analysis, we observed no significant difference in alpha-diversity between the migraine and healthy control groups, as indicated by the Shannon and Chao1 indexes at the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) level (Figure 2A), suggesting similar richness between the two groups. Of note, PCoA based on Bray–Curtis distance matrix, which identified beta diversity differences, revealed a distinct separation of the migraine samples from those of the healthy controls (Figure 2B), highlighting the variability in bacterial composition under migraine stress.
*Richness and diversities of gut microbiota in migraine patients and healthy controls. (A) Shannon and chao1 indexes accessed microbial richness at the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) level. (B) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) using bray-cutis distance matrix distinguishes microbial diversities between groups. (C, D) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) identified discriminating taxa at genus (C) and species (D) levels (p <0.05 and LDA > 4.5 considered significant). B. longum, Bifidobacterium longum; F. saccharivorans, Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans; R. timonensis, Romboutsia timonensis; E. hallii, Eubacterium hallii; P. merdae, Parabacteroides merdae; B. stercoris, Bacteroides stercoris; B. uniformis, Bacteroides uniformis; B. plebeius, Bacteroides plebeius; B. dorei, Bacteroides dorei. Statistical significance using FDR correction: * q <0.05; ** q <0.01; *** q <0.001. (E, F) Relative abundances (log10 ± SEM) of taxa enriched in healthy controls (E) or migraine patients (F). *p <0.05, **p <0.005, **p <0.0005 (Mann-Whitney U-test).
To identify migraine-related taxa, LEfSe was employed to generate a cluster diagram illustrating the differential bacterial genera and species between the groups (Figure 2C,D). Genera such as Blautia, Bifidobacterium, and Eubacterium were found in abundance among healthy controls, while Parabacteroides and Bacteroides were enriched in migraine patients (Figure 2C).
Upon further species identification, LEfSe revealed that Bifidobacterium longum and Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans were the predominant bacteria distinguishing healthy controls from migraine sufferers (Figure 2D). Besides, Bacteroides dorei, Bacteroides plebeius, Bacteroides uniformis, Bacteroides stercoris, and Parabacteroides merdae a were overrepresented in patients with migraine (Figure 2D). Dot plots further illustrated these remarkable differences (Figure 2E,F).
The colonization of B. longum, which was significantly higher in healthy controls than the migraine patients (Figure 2E), suggesting a potential for supplementation of B. longum to reconstruct the dysbiotic gut microbiota of patients with migraines. Although the level of F. saccharivorans in healthy controls was more abundant than that of migraine patients (Figure 2E), its probiotic role was still poorly understood.
B. longum ameliorates pain induced by capsaicin in migraine rat model
Capsaicin-induced migraine rat model
In order to test whether B. longum administration improves the migraine headaches, a relevant rat model for migraine was established. Male Wistar rats (adults aged 7 to 8 weeks and young rats aged 3 to 4 weeks, n = 4-6/group, 2-3 rats per cage) were orally gavaged daily with B. longum or a probiotic control containing BbLa for 2 weeks prior to intracisternal administration of capsaicin (Figure 3A). This capsaicin-induced migraine-mimicking rat model had been well-characterized by increasing the immunoreactivity of c-fos in TCC neurons22^,^33^,^34 and CGRP in TG,22^,^33 as illustrated in the schematic in Figure 3B.
*Effect of B. longum on capsaicin-induced neuronal activation in the trigemino-cervical complex (TCC) and trigeminal ganglia (TG). (A) Experimental design: male Wistar rats (adult 7-8 wk, young 3-4 wk) were pretreated for 2 wk with B. longum (3 × 109 CFU adults; 1.5 × 109 CFU young) or BbLa (250 mg containing B. bifidum (109 CFU) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (109 CFU) adults; 125 mg young) via oral gauge. Rats (n = 4-6/group) then received intracisternal capsaicin (10 nmol). (B) Schematic of migraine pathology showing increased c-Fos and CGRP in the trigeminal system. (C) c-Fos immunohistochemistry (TCC) and CGRP immunofluorescence (TG). Sham rats received vehicle instead of capsaicin. Three TCC and TG sections was analyzed per rat. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Quantification of c-Fos-immunoreactive TCC neurons and CGRP density in TG sections. CGRP density (%) = (activated cell area/full cell area) × 100% in V1 + V2 region. Data are means ± SE. *p <0.05, *p <0.005 (Mann-Whitney U-test).
Anti-migraine effect of B. longum
It is noteworthy that B. longum feeding significantly reduced the immunoreactive (ir) neurons of c-fos and CGRP in TCC and TG, respectively (Figure 3C,D). This finding was reproducible in both young and adult rat models (Figure 3C,D), suggesting an anti-migraine effect of B. longum.
B. longum treatment changes the gut microbiota composition
It is important to pursue how B. longum blocked the capsaicin-activated migraine pain. We assumed that the reconstruction of gut microbiota induced by B. longum could prevent or alleviate the migraine pain. Accordingly, we analyzed the gut microbiota constitution of the aforementioned migraine rat models. Their fecal samples were collected before anesthesia for surgical procedures and the gut microbiota were revealed by 16S rRNA NGS profiling. PCoA analysis based on the Bray–Curtis method demonstrated significant clustering among vehicle-, B. longum- and BbLa-fed groups in both young and adult rats (Figure 4A,B).
*B. longum alters gut microbiota composition and diversity in a migraine rat model. (A, B) PCoA plots based on bray-curtis distance matrix showing beta diversity of fecal microbiota in young (A) and adult (B) rats. (C, D) Genus-level taxa with LDA thresholds of 4.5 (young, C) and 4 (adult, D). (E) Heatmap of Spearman rank correlations coefficient r between Bifidobacterium and other microbiota genera detected in the fecal samples of young and adult rats. (F) Linear regression depicts the negative correlation between Bifidobacterium abundance and total c-Fos-ir cell number in TCC sections of young and adult rats that fed with B. longum. *p <0.01, **p <0.001, **p <0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U-test).
Differentially abundant genera in response to B. longum
A threshold of at least 4 on the logarithmic LDA score was adopted for discriminative features. At the genus level, Akkermansia and Parabacteroides had the highest LDA score for the young and adult migraine rats, respectively (Figure 4C,D). Feeding of B. longum gave rise to an elevation of Bifidobacterium level in both young and adult rats as compared to those of vehicle treatment (Figure 4C,D).
Of note, the abundance of Bifidobacterium in both young and adult rats was negatively correlated to the Parabacteroides (Figure 4E), which was highly colonized in the migraine patients (Figure 2C), hinting that Bifidobacterium may impede the growth of migraine-associated Parabacteroides and improve the microbial balance in gut of the host. Importantly, the abundance of Bifidobacterium was positively correlated with the Faecalibaculum level in both young and adult rats (Figure 4E).
Correlation with neuronal activity
In addition, the fecal levels of Bifidobacterium of both young and adult rats were significantly inversely associated with the number of c-fos-ir neurons in the TCC (Spearman r = -0.7762, p = 0.0043, Figure 4F), further emphasizing the potential anti-migraine role of B. longum.
Gut microbiota differences between migraine patients with and without GI disorders
Clinical characteristics of migraine patients with and without GI disorders
Among the 126 migraine patients, we found that 59 patients (46.8%) were designated as the group with GI disorders (M + G), whereas 67 (53.2%) were without GI disorders (M + noG). There were no differences in the age, sex, onset durations, pain scores, and medication used between M + G versus M + noG groups. (Table 1) Medication used included anti-migraine, vitamins, and anti-allergic drugs. Abdominal pain significantly differentiated migraine patients with GI disorders from those without (50% vs. 13%, p <0.001) (Table 1), while nausea/vomiting were prevalent in both groups (57% vs. 59%, p = 0.861). Patients with GI disorders had higher PedMIDAS scores (60 ± 13.2 vs. 29 ± 7.0, p = 0.042).
Distinct bacterial taxa associated with GI comorbidity
We further compared the gut microbiota profile between patients with M + G and M + noG. Shannon (p <0.03) and Chao1 indexes showed an increased richness of gut microbiota in fecal samples of patients with M + noG (Figure 5A).
In the LEfSe analysis, Streptococcus gallolyticus appeared enriched in patients with M + G, whereas patients with M + noG tended to show higher levels of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans, and others (Figure 5B). Although these findings did not reach significance after FDR correction, we noted several associations of potential biological relevance. In particular, the presence of S. gallolyticus in M + G patients correlated with higher PedMIDAS scores (Spearman r = 0.4679, p <0.007, Figure 5C), suggesting a possible link between this bacterium and more severe clinical manifestations.
Although gut microbiota profiles differed significantly between M + G and M + noG patients, plasma levels of migraine markers (CGRP and PGE2) and inflammatory indices (IL-1β, IL-6, NF-κB, TNF-α, supplementary Figure 1) did not. This underscores the role of gut microbiota in distinguishing the two patient groups.
Protective role of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
In patients of the M + noG group, F. prausnitzii, was significantly linked to a reduced pain score (Spearman r = -0.4814, p <0.0003) and shortened disease duration (Spearman r = -0.3989, p <0.004) (Figure 5C). Patients with M + noG, who exhibited a higher level of F. prausnitzii, showed less severe intestinal inflammation. Their fecal calprotectin levels were significantly lower than those of M + G patients (p <0.02) and comparable to healthy controls (Figure 5D). All of these findings suggest a potential role of F. prausnitzii in migraine management.
Importantly, the growth of F. prausnitzii in M + noG patients was strongly and significantly associated with the richness of B. longum (Spearman r = 0.5731, p <0.0003, Figure 5E), suggesting B. longum may be involved in the regulation of F. prausnitzii. Observations from migraine rat model further support this finding. In both young and adult rats, a positive correlation between Bifidobacterium and Faecalibaculum levels was established in response to B. longum supplementation (Figure 4E), hinting that these bacteria may act synergistically to counter migraine attack in both humans and rats.
B. longum and F. prausnitzii associate with better clinical scores
To test the aforementioned hypothesis, the importance of B. longum and F. prausnitzii in migraine patients during the attack period was specifically studied using Spearman correlation coefficient analysis. A significant negative association between B. longum and pain score (Spearman r = -0.3956, p <0.03), as well as disease duration (Spearman r = -0.5214, p <0.002), was observed in patients with M + noG (Figure 6A,B), similar to the associations observed for F. prausnitzii (Figures 5C and 6A). Additionally, F. saccharivorans further contributed to the negative association of the disease duration and pain score of M + noG and M + G patients (Figure 6A). In combination of the effects of F. prausnitzii, B. longum and F. saccharivorans, a trend of decreasing pain score and disease duration was observed in patients with M + noG as compare to those with M + G (Figure 6C). Although F. prausnitzii and F. saccharivorans contributed to the reduction in pain scores in M + G patients, they could not achieve the same level of reduction as observed in M + noG patients presumably due to the absence of B. longum involvement (Figure 6A and C).
*Bacterial diversity and clinical correlations between migraine patients with and without GI disorders. (A) Shannon and Chao1 indexes at the ASV level. (B) LEfSe identified discriminating taxa (p <0.05 and LDA > 4): S. gallolyticus, Streptococcus gallolyticus; A. inops, Alistipes inops; R. torques, Ruminococcus torques; F. saccharivorans, Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans; F. prausnitzii, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. (C) Spearman correlations between bacteria and clinical factors (pain score, PedMIDAS and disease duration) in patients with (M + G) or without (M + noG) GI disorder. (D) Fecal calprotectin levels among M + G (n = 35), M + noG (n = 49), and healthy controls (n = 48). (E) Heatmap of Spearman correlations between F. prausnitzii and S. gallolyticus/B. longum during non-attack (NA) and attack (A) periods. *p <0.05, **p <0.005, **p <0.0005 (Mann-Whitney U-test).
*B. longum negatively associates with migraine activity of patients without GI disorders. (A) Heatmaps of Spearman rank correlation r values between gut microbiota and clinical variables indicated. Fecal samples collected during attack phase of migraine patients with GI disorders (M + G) and those without GI disorders (M + noG) were analyzed. *p <0.05, *p <0.005 by Mann-Whitney U-test. (B) Linear regression plots depicting correlations between B. longum and pain score (left) or disease duration (right) of M + noG patients during attack phase. (C) Violin plots show the range and distribution of pain score (upper) and disease duration (lower) of patients with M + G or M + noG. (D) A comparison of the relative abundance (%) of B. longum detected during non-attack (NA) and attack (A) stages of M + G and M + noG patients.
In addition, the growth of B. longum in M + noG patients was more rapid during non-attack intervals but significantly decreased after transitioning into the attack stage (Figure 6D). This suggests the importance of maintaining a high level of B. longum to prevent GI manifestation and even migraine attacks.
Pathogenic bacterial species associated with poor prognosis
On the other hand, bacteria such as B. dorei, B. plebeius, B. uniformis, B. stercoris, and P. merdae were more abundant in migraine patients (Figure 2D) and were positively associated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher PedMIDAS scores, more frequent attacks, and elevated calprotectin level (Figure 6A). These associations suggest their potential pathogenic roles in migraine attacks.
B. longum appears to reduce headache burden in pediatric migraine patients
Study subjects
In our exploratory pilot study, with 17 migraine patients (9 female) receiving B. longum (BL) and 6 (3 female) receiving B. bifidum/L. acidophilus (supplementary Figure 2). The two groups were comparable in sex (p = 0.901) and age (10.8 ± 0.7 vs. 12.1 ± 1.2, p = 0.29, by Mann-Whitney U test) at baseline.
Effect of B. longum on pain scores and headache days
Patients receiving B. longum (7 × 10⁹ CFU) exhibited a statistically significant improvement in least-squares (LS) mean pain scores from week 1 to week 12 (Wald test, p = 0.025). The LS mean change was greater in the BL group (–0.64) than in the control group (–0.15). A significant reduction in the LS mean number of weekly headache days was also observed from week 1 to week 12 (Wald test, p = 0.014), with a greater LS mean change in the BL group (–1.29) compared to the control group (–0.5). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the control group across any headache parameters (p = 0.6 and 0.75 for weekly headache days and pain scores, respectively), shown in Figure 7A−D. No serious adverse events were reported in either group.
*Therapeutic effects of B. longum in pediatric migraine patients compared to the group using B. bifidum/L. acidophilus. Over the 12-week study period, patients treated with B. longum (BL, n = 17) demonstrated significant improvements in clinical outcomes by least-squares (LS) mean comparison, including significant reduction of pain scores after treatment (p = 0.025) (A-B), and weekly headache days (p = 0.014) (C-D). No significant changes were observed in the group taking B. bifidum/L. acidophilus (BbLa, n = 6) for any parameters (all p > 0.05) (A-D). p <0.05 by the Wald test. The beneficial effects of BL on weekly trends in the median number of headache days (E) and attack frequencies (F) are shown.
Longitudinal trends in headache frequency
In addition, we found that the BL group showed a decrease after week 2, followed by stabilization at around 1 headache day per week by week 8 post-treatment (Figure 7E). In contrast, the BbLa group generally maintained a higher number of headache days per week, typically ranging between 2 and 3.5 days. The median weekly attack frequency showed that the BL group initially had a similar frequency to the control group but began to trend toward a lower and more stable frequency (~1–2 times/week) from Week 5 onward. Conversely, the control group exhibited greater variability and a higher frequency of attacks, with a notable peak at Week 4 (Figure 7F).
Altogether, these data suggest that the BL group experienced better outcomes in terms of reduced pain scores, fewer headache days, and lower attack frequency compared to the control group. This indicates a potential therapeutic benefit of BL treatment in managing headache-related symptoms.
Discussion
Novelty of the study and microbiome-related clinical features
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize the microbiota in pediatric migraine patients with and without GI disorders. Distinct microbial and clinical profiles were identified, with B. longum emerging as a key species distinguishing healthy controls from migraine patients. Application of B. longum to the migraine-mimicking animal model confirmed its protective roles in both adult and pediatric ages. An exploratory pilot study further showed that B. longum is promising to reduce headache burden in pediatric migraine patients.
To characterize the differential microbiome-related clinical features in migraine patients, we found that, among patients without GI symptoms, B. longum abundance was associated with milder pain and shorter disease duration, and its co-occurrence with F. prausnitzii suggests a beneficial microbial network. In contrast, S. gallolyticus was enriched in those with GI manifestations and linked to greater disability, indicating a distinct microbiota signature underlying migraine-GI comorbidity. These findings support the role of gut dysbiosis in migraine pathogenesis and highlight B. longum as a promising microbiome-targeted therapeutic.
Identifying B. longum as a signature bacterium with therapeutic potential
In our rat model, B. longum attenuated neuronal activation markers such as c-Fos in the TCC and reduced CGRP expression in the TG, consistent with its known anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties.35^,^36 Clinically, pediatric migraine patients receiving B. longum exhibited significant improvements in pain intensity, attack frequency, and headache days, while no such effects were seen in the B. bifidum/L. acidophilus group, reinforcing the efficacy of B. longum. Previous studies have shown the psychotropic and immunomodulatory benefits of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species across a range of neurological and inflammatory conditions.35-38 Probiotics can enhance the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier39 and may be beneficial to the gut-brain axis. However, few probiotic trials have targeted migraine.40 Our results align with earlier reports where B. longum-containing multispecies probiotics improved migraine symptoms,41 unlike those lacking this strain.42 The current findings advance this evidence by isolating B. longum's specific impact.
Gut-brain axis in migraine
Mechanistically, how gut microbes influence central migraine pathways remains incompletely understood. The proximity and connectivity between the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and the trigeminal nucleus caudalis suggest a gut-brain interface modulated by microbial activity.43^,^44 Repeated unpleasant GI stimuli can cause central sensitization in the NTS,45 which, through its connections with the TNC, may lead to neurogenic inflammation in the dura mater and headaches.46 A growing body of evidence supports a biologically plausible pathway by which gut microbial alterations can modulate peripheral and central nociceptive signaling relevant to migraine. Gut microbes influence host neuroimmune signaling and metabolite profiles, notably short-chain fatty acids, which in turn can alter sensory neuron excitability and neuropeptide release. CGRP is a central effector in both visceral sensory signaling and migraine pathophysiology and is therefore a plausible mediator linking dysbiosis to headache-relevant neural activation.47 Preclinical work shows that gut microbes affect visceral sensitivity by regulating CGRP production, and changing the microbiota can alter CGRP-dependent signaling.48 This helps explain why microbiota disturbances can increase CGRP and c-Fos activity in trigeminovascular circuits. Shifts in intestinal sensory neuron activity may make vagal and spinal nerves, as well as trigeminal neurons, more sensitive, leading to greater CGRP release and the c-Fos response seen in our study. Nevertheless, plasma CGRP levels and other proinflammatory cytokines were not significantly different between migraine sufferers with and without GI disorder, implying these factors may play a shared detrimental role in migraine regardless of GI symptoms. Interestingly, evidence have shown that B. longum can normalize behavior in anxious mice via the vagus nerve,38 suggesting neurotransmission possibilities.
Potential roles of other gut microbes
F. prausnitzii is being investigated as a next-generation probiotic particularly for GI diseases, due to its anti-inflammatory properties and its role in modulating metabolic processes.49^,^50 In the current study, we found the positive association of abundance of B. longum and F. prausnitzii with reduced migraine severity in the non-GI disorder group. F. prausnitzii is known for its ability to reduce IL-12 and IFN-γ production while enhancing high secretion of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine with therapeutic potential.51^,^52 Several studies have reported cooperative cross-feeding interactions between F. prausnitzii and Bifidobacteria, including B. longum and its subspecies.53^,^54 The commonly described mechanism is that Bifidobacteria ferment carbohydrates to acetate (or lactate/oligosaccharide breakdown products), which F. prausnitzii subsequently utilizes to produce butyrate, a beneficial short-chain fatty acid that promotes the growth of F. prausnitzii and Bifidobacteria. Therefore, we hypothesize that the enrichment of F. prausnitzii specifically in M + noG patients may attenuate GI inflammation and concurrently promote the expansion of B. longum, thereby creating a mutually beneficial environment that supports the bacterial survival.
On the other hand, S. gallolyticus, a known oncomicrobe,55 was enriched in migraine patients with GI disorder in the current study. It has been implicated in promoting colon cancer development through activation of the MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways,56 both of which are also relevant to migraine pathophysiology. Activation of MAPK signaling mediates the up-regulation of CGRP in rat TG.57 Pharmacological inhibition of PI3K relieves the pain hypersensitivity of chronic migraine rat model and this effect can be reversed by PI3K-specific agonist.58 We hypothesized that S. gallolyticus may exacerbate migraine pain by initiating MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR cascades. Although there is no direct evidence linking S. gallolyticus specifically to migraine, it has been detected in central nervous system (CNS) infections, such as human meningitis.59 In veterinary studies, S. gallolyticus has been reported to cause central nervous manifestations, including severe neurological manifestations in geese,60 and encephalitis and meningitis in poults.61 Our study reveals a possible role of S. gallolyticus in pediatric migraine, which awaits confirmation from further clinical or mechanistic studies.
Intestinal inflammation and GI symptoms
Elevated fecal calprotectin levels in migraine patients with GI disorders further support a role for mucosal inflammation. Calprotectin, a neutrophil-derived protein62 and biomarker of intestinal inflammation,63 has also been associated with pediatric episodic syndromes like infantile colic,64 recognized migraine variants. Thus, intestinal inflammation may modulate migraine expression, especially in comorbid GI conditions.
Limitations and future perspectives
This study is limited by its single-center design and may reflect only the patient population of an urban area. Furthermore, identifying a particular strain of B. longum with potential benefits for migraine warrants further exploration. Future large-scale, multicenter trials are needed to validate these results and explore the mechanisms linking microbial dysbiosis to migraine via immune, metabolic, and neurogenic pathways. At the preclinical level, we acknowledge that electrophysiological measures, such as trigeminocervical complex recordings, could provide additional insight into migraine-related neural activity. The absence of these assessments is a limitation of the present study and should be addressed in future experiments. Second, preclinical experiments in this study were performed only in male animals, whereas the clinical pilot trial included both sexes. Sex differences may influence pain, immune responses, and gut–brain interactions, potentially affecting the translational relevance of the findings. Future studies should incorporate both sexes in animal models to clarify these effects. In addition, we have not analyzed intestinal tissues collected from the animals to assess disease- and treatment-associated changes; this can be addressed in future studies.
Conclusions
In this study, we identified distinct microbiome signatures in pediatric migraine patients with B. longum emerging as a key protective species, and different microbiome profiles in patients with or without GI disorders. The potential synergism of B. longum with F. prausnitzii and the association of S. gallolyticus with GI symptoms and disability underscore the complexity of migraine-microbiome interactions. These findings support future studies and the development of microbiota-targeted strategies, particularly B. longum supplementation, as promising adjunctive therapies for pediatric migraine management.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary materialsupplement fig 2
Supplementary materialS1 Figures
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Goadsby PJ. Recent advances in understanding migraine mechanisms, molecules and therapeutics. Trends Mol Med. 2007 Jan;13(1):39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.11.005.17141570 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Menken M, Munsat TL, Toole JF. The global burden of disease study: implications for neurology. Arch Neurol. 2000 Mar;57(3):418–20. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.3.418.10714674 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Durham PL. CGRP-receptor antagonists--a fresh approach to migraine therapy? N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 11;350(11):1073–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJ Mp 048016.15014178 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Landini L, de Araujo DSM, Chieca M, Souza Monteiro de Araujo D, De Siena G, Bellantoni E, Geppetti P, Nassini R, De Logu F. Acetaldehyde via CGRP receptor and TRPA 1 in Schwann cells mediates ethanol-evoked periorbital mechanical allodynia in mice: relevance for migraine. J Biomed Sci. 2023 Apr 26;30(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s 12929-023-00922-6.37101198 PMC 10131321 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Fan PC, Kuo PH, Chang SH, Lee W, Wu R, Chiou L. Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide in diagnosing and predicting paediatric migraine. Cephalalgia. 2009 Aug;29(8):883–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01816.x.19236383 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Fan PC, Kuo PH, Lee MT, Chang S, Chiou L. Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide: a potential biomarker for diagnosis and therapeutic responses in pediatric migraine. Front Neurol. 2019;10:10. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00010.30733702 PMC 6353836 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Messlinger K. The big CGRP flood - sources, sinks and signalling sites in the trigeminovascular system. J Headache Pain. 2018 Mar 12;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s 10194-018-0848-0.29532195 PMC 5847494 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Ramon C, Cernuda-Morollon E, Pascual J. Calcitonin gene-related peptide in peripheral blood as a biomarker for migraine. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Jun;30(3):281–286. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000440.28234796 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗