Subacute puerperal uterine inversion secondary to a large uterine myoma: a case report
Juan Yang, Shilin Zhong, Wei Cheng, Yuqing Deng, Ying Wang, Yuzhen Liu

TL;DR
A rare case of late uterine inversion caused by a large uterine tumor was successfully treated with surgery, highlighting the importance of timely diagnosis and individualized care.
Contribution
Reports a rare case linking a large submucosal myoma to subacute puerperal uterine inversion and its successful surgical management.
Findings
A giant submucosal leiomyoma caused grade I uterine inversion 19 days postpartum.
Manual reduction failed, but laparotomy with myomectomy and balloon tamponade resolved the condition.
MRI and tailored surgical intervention are critical for preserving fertility and correcting inversion.
Abstract
Uterine inversion is a life-threatening obstetric emergency characterized by the turning inside out of the uterine fundus into the endometrial cavity or beyond the cervix. Common risk factors include fundal pressure, cord traction, placental disorders, and uterine atony. We report a rare case of subacute puerperal uterine inversion caused by a giant prolapsing submucosal leiomyoma in a 36-year-old woman who presented on postpartum day 19 with fever, abdominal pain, and prolapse of a vaginal mass. Imaging revealed a large submucosal myoma and grade I uterine inversion. Initial manual reduction failed. Successful management was achieved via laparotomy, with myomectomy through a uterine incision, uterine restoration, and intrauterine balloon tamponade.A large submucosal myoma can be a significant risk factor for late puerperal uterine inversion. Timely diagnosis using magnetic resonance…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMaternal and fetal healthcare · Uterine Myomas and Treatments · Gynecological conditions and treatments
Introduction
Uterine inversion, the collapse of the uterine fundus into the endometrial cavity, is classified as acute (<24 hours), subacute (24 hours to 30 days), or chronic (>30 days) [1]. Most cases occur during the immediate puerperium [2], with approximately 83.4% being acute [3]. It is a significant cause of traumatic shock, hemorrhagic shock, and puerperal infection. Common risk factors include fundal pressure, cord traction, and placental disorders [1]. The condition often has an insidious onset and atypical manifestations, leading to potential diagnostic delays. We report a rare case of subacute puerperal uterine inversion caused by a giant prolapsing submucosal leiomyoma to enhance clinical awareness and management.
Case presentation
A 36-year-old gravida 3 para 1 woman, who had been diagnosed one year earlier with a right intramural uterine myoma (38 × 96 mm, ≥50% subserosal), presented at 39^+1^ weeks of gestation in her second pregnancy. Serial antenatal ultrasounds documented progressive enlargement of the myoma, which reached 111 × 89 × 92 mm prior to delivery. She underwent an uncomplicated spontaneous vaginal delivery of a healthy 3000 g infant, recovered smoothly in the immediate postpartum period, and was discharged on postpartum day 2.
On postpartum day 14, she developed a persistent high-grade fever refractory to antibiotics, with imaging showing myoma enlargement and leukocytosis. A CT scan on day 17 revealed ileocecal inflammation and uterine fluid. By postpartum day 19, she reported abdominal pain, lumbar soreness, prolapse of a vaginal mass, and vaginal bleeding (approximately 1.5 times her usual menstrual flow). The mass prolapsed further during the Valsalva maneuver, and she developed urinary retention requiring catheterization. Repeat ultrasound showed a 20 mm fundal serosal indentation and a 90 × 60 mm isoechoic mass on the right uterine wall. Laboratory studies yielded the following: WBC 10.54 × 10^9^/L, hemoglobin 101 g/L, procalcitonin 0.47 ng/mL, and IL-6 31 pg/mL. She was subsequently admitted.
On physical examination, she was afebrile (36.6°C) but tachycardic (117 bpm). Her pre-pregnancy BMI was 17.6 kg/m^2^ (height 165 cm, weight 48 kg). A dark red, tongue-shaped mass (3 × 3 × 5 cm) protruded from the vaginal introitus, with a larger firm mass (7 × 8 × 9 cm) palpable inside the vagina. The cervix was palpable around the mass; the uterus was anteverted, equivalent in size to a 12-week gestation, mobile, and non-tender. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a fundal myometrial indentation, an 86 × 82 × 105 mm heterogeneous intrauterine mass (suggestive of a degenerated submucosal myoma), and a mass extending from the cervical os to the introitus (Fig. 1). Admission diagnoses were: 1) Subacute uterine inversion (Grade I); 2) Prolapsed large submucosal myoma; and 3) Puerperal infection.
MRI features of subacute uterine inversion secondary to a large uterine myoma. A: Paramedian sagittal T2-weighted turbo spin-echo image showed a lobulated fundal depression (white arrow) and the underlying uterine myoma (black arrow); B: Paramedian sagittal T2-weighted turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) image demonstrated the myoma prolapsing from the uterine cavity into the vagina (white arrow), with a portion extending through the introitus (black arrow); C: Coronal T1-weighted image revealed the myometrial indentation (white arrow) and the compressed urinary bladder (black arrow); D: Axial T2-weighted turbo spin-echo image showed the myometrial depression (white arrow) on the right anterofundal wall.
Intravenous antibiotics were administered. The following day, ultrasound-guided excision of the tongue-shaped introital mass and manual reduction were attempted; however, the vaginal mass reprolapsed immediately after initial reduction. A subsequent attempt at reduction combined with cervical cerclage was unsuccessful, prompting laparotomy.
At laparotomy, the uterus was sized at 12 weeks with a 2.5 × 4 cm depression on the right anterofundal wall (Fig. 2A). Following an unsuccessful transvaginal reduction, a uterine incision was made over the depression, exposing and enucleating a 9 cm submucosal myoma (Fig. 2B). The myoma bed was sutured, and minimal endometrial bleeding was controlled with intrauterine balloon tamponade alongside pelvic drain placement. Postoperative recovery with antibiotics, uterotonics, and anemia correction was uneventful. The balloon was removed the next day, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 7. Pathology confirmed uterine leiomyoma with vascular changes in the main mass and infarction in the introital specimen. A follow-up ultrasound on day 15 was normal.
Intraoperative findings during laparotomy for uterine inversion. A: Enlarged uterus with smooth serosa; a 2.5 cm-diameter, 4 cm-deep distinct depression (white arrow) on the right anterofundal wall; B: Surgically enucleated, bisected uterine myoma, showing typical leiomyoma gross features: Dark red color, soft consistency, whorled cut surface.
Discussion
This case of subacute puerperal uterine inversion was triggered by a giant prolapsing submucosal leiomyoma. The inversion likely resulted from a combination of forceful traction and structural vulnerability: marked myoma enlargement created a sustained pull on the uterine wall, while the soft, postpartum myometrium (potentially weakened by infection and the patient's low BMI) offered diminished resistance. Multiparity and a triggering event like coughing may have further contributed.
This subacute presentation on postpartum day 19, marked by less severe hemorrhage possibly from partial endometrial repair, featured the characteristic triad of abdominal pain, mass prolapse, and urinary obstruction. MRI was crucial for diagnosis: it confirmed the inversion and delineated the myoma, demonstrating a "V-shaped" fundal indentation on sagittal view [4] and a focal "lobulated" appearance on axial view instead of the classic "bull's-eye" sign [1], which correlated with the surgical finding of a right anterofundal depression.
Management of puerperal uterine inversion depends on acuity and associated factors. Non-surgical reduction is first-line in acute cases [5]. However, a large myoma, as in this case, often precludes successful manual reduction, necessitating surgery. An abdominal approach is preferred in most cases [6]. For women not desiring future fertility, a transabdominal approach with myomectomy via the thinned, inverted uterine wall followed by hysterorrhaphy is effective. For those wishing to preserve fertility, a transverse lower uterine segment incision may be preferable for myoma removal and uterine restoration, potentially reducing future rupture risk. Concomitant cervical cerclage [7] or intrauterine balloon tamponade [8] can help prevent recurrence and control bleeding, especially with a patulous cervix. Preoperative planning should carefully assess inversion morphology, myoma characteristics, and their spatial relationship.
In conclusion, this case establishes a large submucosal myoma as a risk factor for late puerperal uterine inversion. Recognizing its distinct clinical and radiological features is crucial for timely diagnosis. Management must be individualized, focusing on anatomical correction, eradication of the myoma, and preservation of fertility.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Wendel MP, Shnaekel KL, Magann EF. Uterine inversion: a review of a life-threatening obstetrical emergency. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2018;73:411–7. 10.1097/OGX.000000000000058030062382 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Coad SL, Dahlgren LS, Hutcheon JA. Risks and consequences of puerperal uterine inversion in the United States, 2004 through 2013. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:377.e 1–6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.01828522320 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Anne S, Singh N, Garg A, et al. Puerperal uterine inversion- mismanaged third stage of labour: a diagnostic challenge. Med J Armed Forces India 2024;80:S 284–7. 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.02.00639734861 PMC 11670631 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Mihmanli V, Kilic F, Pul S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of non-puerperal complete uterine inversion. Iran J Radiol 2015;12:e 9878. 10.5812/iranjradiol.9878 v 226715983 PMC 4691525 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Gao Q, Jiang H, Jia M, et al. Acute puerperal uterine inversion with successful manual transvaginal repositioning: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103:e 37986. 10.1097/MD.000000000003798638669392 PMC 11049735 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Herath RP, Patabendige M, Rashid M, et al. Nonpuerperal uterine inversion: what the gynaecologists need to know? Obstet Gynecol Int 2020;2020:8625186. 10.1155/2020/862518632565821 PMC 7285247 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Marasinghe JP, Epitawela D, Cole S, et al. Uterine balloon tamponade device and cervical Cerclage to correct partial uterine inversion during puerperium. Case Report Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015;80:67–70. 10.1159/00037019425633203 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Thiam M, Niang MM, Gueye L, et al. Puerperal uterine inversion managed by the uterine balloon tamponade. Pan Afr Med J 2015;22:331. 10.11604/pamj.2015.22.331.782326977239 PMC 4769814 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
