Addendum: A novel estimate of biological aging by multiple fitness tests is associated with risk scores for age-related diseases
A. Manca, G. Fiorito, M. Morrone, A. Boi, B. Mercante, G. Martinez, L. Ventura, A. P. Delitala, A. Cano, M. G. Catte, G. Solinas, F. Melis, F. Ginatempo, F. Deriu
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms · Evolution and Genetic Dynamics · Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
The formula by which Fitness Age is calculated was not reported in the section Results, Fitness age definition and components, below table 2:
“
Where means (µ) and standard deviations (σ) were computed on this dataset:
TUG_time_ (s): µ = 6.69; σ = 1.38
Handgrip_normalized_ (by bodyweight in kg): µ = 0.37; σ = 0.11
6MWT_distance_ (m): µ = 502.38; σ = 74.94
fast10MWT_time_ (s): µ = 4.75; σ = 0.93
4SST_time_ (s): µ = 3.67; σ = 0.81
StrongerQuadStrength_normalized_ (by bodyweight in kg): µ = 0.56; σ = 0.13”