# Significance of Serum Tumor Markers in Esophageal and Gastric Cancers: A Systematic Literature Review

**Authors:** Yasunori Matsumoto, Takeshi Toyozumi, Hideaki Shimada

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ags3.70095 · Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery · 2025-09-15

## TL;DR

This paper reviews serum tumor markers for esophageal and gastric cancers, identifying which markers are most useful for diagnosis and prognosis.

## Contribution

The study provides a systematic evaluation of serum tumor markers for ESCC and GC, highlighting their diagnostic and prognostic significance.

## Key findings

- SCC-Ag is the most sensitive and prognostic marker for ESCC.
- CEA and CA125 are the most valuable markers for GC prognosis.
- CA125 and CA72-4 are associated with peritoneal dissemination in GC.

## Abstract

Serum tumor markers are helpful for diagnosis, monitoring treatment outcomes, and prognosis. However, their clinical utility for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate recent studies on serum tumor markers in ESCC and GC.

We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies published between January 2010 and March 2025 using PubMed. Overall, 84 and 468 articles on ESCC and GC were extracted, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and evaluated using a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Prognostic values were assessed using the hazard ratio based on univariate and multivariate analyses.

In ESCC, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC‐Ag) exhibited the highest sensitivity (38.7%) and positive predictive value (85.2%); moreover, it was the only independent prognostic factor across multiple articles. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment had low sensitivity and predictive value, whereas serum p53 antibody demonstrated moderate prognostic relevance. In GC, CEA and CA125 had the highest sensitivity (37.2%) and positive predictive value (72.2%), respectively, and CA125 and CA72‐4 were associated with peritoneal dissemination. CEA and CA125 levels were independent prognostic markers of GC.

SCC‐Ag is a key marker for ESCC diagnosis and prognosis. CEA and CA125 are valuable markers for GC prognosis, whereas CA125 and CA72‐4 help detect peritoneal dissemination. Further research integrating the molecular characteristics of each tumor marker is warranted.

The utility of serum tumor markers in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cancer were evaluated by systematic review and meta‐analysis. In addition, the position of each marker, strategies for improving their accuracy in the future, and new markers are also described.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** CEACAM5 (CEA cell adhesion molecule 5), MUC16 (mucin 16, cell surface associated)
- **Diseases:** esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (MONDO:0005580), gastric cancer (MONDO:0001056)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** KRT19 (keratin 19) [NCBI Gene 3880] {aka CK19, K19, K1CS}, MUC16 (mucin 16, cell surface associated) [NCBI Gene 94025] {aka CA125}, TP53 (tumor protein p53) [NCBI Gene 7157] {aka BCC7, BMFS5, LFS1, P53, TRP53}
- **Diseases:** Tumor (MESH:D009369), Esophageal and Gastric Cancers (MESH:D013274), peritoneal dissemination (MESH:D010538), ESCC (MESH:D000077277)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12757164/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12757164/full.md

## References

66 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12757164/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12757164