# Impact of injection scheduling on CO2 migration and trapping efficiency in the Johansen formation

**Authors:** Hai T. Nguyen

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340048 · PLOS One · 2025-12-31

## TL;DR

This study shows that injection scheduling has little long-term impact on CO2 trapping in saline aquifers like the Johansen formation, with storage security mainly determined by reservoir properties.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that injection scheduling affects short-term injectivity but not long-term CO2 trapping efficiency in saline aquifers.

## Key findings

- All injection strategies result in similar trapping efficiency after 1000 years, with differences less than 2% of the total injected mass.
- Reservoir properties and dissolution dynamics, not injection scheduling, primarily determine long-term CO2 storage security.
- Short-term injectivity and peak bottom hole pressure vary significantly between injection strategies, with differences up to 80 bar.

## Abstract

Injection scheduling is increasingly considered as an operational lever for optimizing carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in saline aquifers, yet its long-term impact on trapping efficiency at field scale remains uncertain. This study employs a field-calibrated vertical equilibrium model of the Johansen formation, offshore Norway, to compare four injection strategies: constant, ramped, pulsed, and low steady, under equal total injected mass. Simulations span 1000 years, including both injection and post-injection phases, to evaluate plume migration, bottom hole pressure (BHP) evolution, and partitioning among residual and solubility trapping. Results show that while injection schedule significantly influences short-term injectivity and peak BHP with differences up to 80 bar, its effect on millennial-scale trapping efficiency is negligible. By 1000 years, all scenarios converge to a similar distribution, with 57–58% dissolved in brine, 30–34% immobilized by residual trapping, and 8–9% persisting as a mobile plume, with inter-schedule differences less than 2% of the total injected mass. These findings indicate that, in a laterally open and well-connected aquifer such as Johansen, long-term storage security is governed primarily by reservoir properties and dissolution dynamics rather than by operational schedule. Consequently, injection scheduling should be regarded as a tool for short-term pressure management and infrastructure safety, not as a determinant of ultimate storage performance. This distinction provides practical guidance for designing CO2 storage projects and regulatory assessments of long-term containment.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** carbon dioxide (PubChem CID 280), CO2 (PubChem CID 280), brine (PubChem CID 57417360)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** brine (MESH:C017082), CO2 (MESH:D002245)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12755734/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12755734/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12755734/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12755734