# A Preliminary Mechanics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Objective Assessment of Parkinson’s Disease and Rehabilitation Outcomes

## TL;DR

A new machine learning framework using force-plate data can objectively assess Parkinson's disease and rehabilitation outcomes by detecting subtle motor changes.

## Contribution

The novel framework integrates mechanics-informed machine learning with force-plate data to assess Parkinson's rehabilitation outcomes objectively.

## Key findings

- K-means clustering showed post-intervention states shifted toward control clusters in five of six intervention patients.
- ML methods detected subtle postural adaptations that traditional tests missed, with strong clustering performance metrics.
- Features like RMS-SML and PL-SAP showed large effect sizes distinguishing PD patients from healthy controls.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Non-invasive methods for evaluating rehabilitation outcomes in Parkinson’s disease (PD) remain limited. This preliminary study proposes a mechanics-informed machine learning (ML) framework integrating force-plate data with dimensionality reduction, clustering, and statistical analysis to objectively assess motor control and the effects of a targeted intervention. Methods: Twelve PD patients were randomly assigned to a PD control group performing standard exercises or an intervention group incorporating additional transverse-plane trunk motion exercises for 10 weeks. Ground reaction forces and center of pressure (COP) signals were recorded pre- and post-intervention using a force plate, alongside data from six healthy individuals as a benchmark. Features related to postural sway and COP dynamics were extracted and refined using Forward Feature Selection. Dimensionality reduction (t-SNE) and unsupervised clustering (K-means) identified group-level patterns. SHAP values and Cohen’s d quantified feature importance and effect size. Clustering robustness was assessed with bootstrapping, nested cross-validation, and permutation testing. Results: K-means clustering revealed clear pre/post-intervention separation in five of six intervention patients, with post-intervention states shifting toward the control cluster. Clustering showed strong performance (Silhouette 0.77–0.79; Calinski–Harabasz 100.8–184.9; Davies–Bouldin 0.29–0.45). The most predictive features (RMS-SML and PL-SAP) showed large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = –12.1 and –4.53, respectively) distinguishing PD patients from healthy controls. Traditional statistical tests (e.g., ANOVA) failed to detect within-group changes (p > 0.05), but ML-based methods captured subtle, nonlinear postural adaptations. Conclusions: This preliminary mechanics-informed ML framework detects PD-related motor deficits and rehabilitation-induced improvements using force-plate data, warranting validation in larger cohorts.