# An AHP-ME-IOWA Model for Assessing National Space Technology Scientific and Technological Strength: A Case Study of the United States

**Authors:** Yingying Chen, Zhenqiang Qi, Jinzhao Li, Yuting Zhu

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/e27111141 · Entropy · 2025-11-06

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new model to evaluate a country's space technology strength, using the United States as a case study.

## Contribution

The novel AHP-ME-IOWA model integrates multiple decision-making techniques to assess scientific and technological strength in space technology.

## Key findings

- The United States scored 8.73 out of 10 in its STSST evaluation.
- The model effectively mitigates outlier impacts and enhances weight robustness.
- The results align with the actual technological landscape, validating the model.

## Abstract

Space technology, a frontier of global scientific innovation, is crucial for competitive edges and national tech innovation. Amid intensified international competition and rapid technological change, scientifically evaluating a country’s Scientific and Technological Strength in Space Technology (STSST) is vital. A model is innovatively proposed in this study called “Analytic Hierarchy Process-Maximum Entropy-Induced Ordered Weighted Average (AHP-ME-IOWA)” for the assessment of STSST. First, an STSST assessment indicator system is developed with four sub-dimensions: scientific research, industrial operation, innovation output, and policy resources. Second, the AHP model is used to convert experts’ qualitative judgments on indicator importance into initial individual weight vectors. Subsequently, the IOWA operator is employed to aggregate these individual weight vectors, thereby mitigating the impact of outliers and enhancing the robustness of the weights. Specifically, the weights are reordered using the cosine similarity between each expert’s weight vector and the temporary group mean as the induced value. Position weights are then determined via the ME method, and consensus weights are derived through re-aggregation. A systematic evaluation of the United States’ STSST was conducted using this method. The results show that the United States achieved a comprehensive STSST score of 8.73 (out of 10), which is in line with the actual situation, thereby providing empirical validation for the proposed method.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** injury to (MESH:D014947), STSST (MESH:C000719218)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12651672/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12651672/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12651672/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12651672